Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Anthony S. Destefano v. State, 5D18-1521 (2018)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 5D18-1521 Visitors: 1
Filed: Aug. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED ANTHONY S. DESTEFANO, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D18-1521 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed August 17, 2018 3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County, Elaine A. Barbour, Judge. Anthony S. Destefano, South Bay, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, Assistant Attorney Gene
More
         IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                              FIFTH DISTRICT

                                                 NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
                                                 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
                                                 DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED


ANTHONY S. DESTEFANO,

             Appellant,

 v.                                                       Case No. 5D18-1521

STATE OF FLORIDA,

             Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed August 17, 2018

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court
for Osceola County,
Elaine A. Barbour, Judge.

Anthony S. Destefano, South Bay, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,
Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp,
Assistant Attorney General, Daytona
Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

      Anthony S. DeStefano appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction

relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm as to Grounds

Two through Five.        However, because the record does not conclusively refute

DeStefano’s claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the prosecutor’s

comments on the law applicable to his sentencing, we reverse the summary denial of

Ground One and remand for attachment of portions of the record conclusively refuting
that claim or for an evidentiary hearing. See Freeman v. State, 
761 So. 2d 1055
, 1061

(Fla. 2000) ("[A] defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on a postconviction relief

motion unless (1) the motion, files, and records in the case conclusively show that the

prisoner is entitled to no relief, or (2) the motion or a particular claim is legally insufficient."

(citing Maharaj v. State, 
684 So. 2d 726
(Fla. 1996))).

       AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, BERGER, and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.




                                                 2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer