Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ferguson v. US Dept. of Commerce, 86-079-CIV-T-17 (1988)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: 86-079-CIV-T-17 Visitors: 1
Judges: Kovachevich
Filed: Jul. 06, 1988
Latest Update: Apr. 07, 2017
Summary: 694 F. Supp. 1541 (1988) Clarence FERGUSON, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Defendant. No. 86-079-CIV-T-17. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. July 6, 1988. Roger C. Benson, Law Firm of Roger C. Benson, St. Petersburg, Fla., for plaintiff. Thomas Conley, Office of General Counsel, Dept. of Commerce, Washington, D.C., *1542 and Peter B. Loewenberg, Asst. U.S. Atty., Tampa, Fla., for defendant. ORDER VACATING AND WITHDRAWING JUDGMENT KOVACHEVICH, Distri
More
694 F. Supp. 1541 (1988)

Clarence FERGUSON, Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Defendant.

No. 86-079-CIV-T-17.

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division.

July 6, 1988.

Roger C. Benson, Law Firm of Roger C. Benson, St. Petersburg, Fla., for plaintiff.

Thomas Conley, Office of General Counsel, Dept. of Commerce, Washington, D.C., *1542 and Peter B. Loewenberg, Asst. U.S. Atty., Tampa, Fla., for defendant.

ORDER VACATING AND WITHDRAWING JUDGMENT

KOVACHEVICH, District Judge.

This cause is before the Court on Plaintiff's motion to vacate and withdraw the judgment entered in this case on March 1, 1988. Plaintiff advises the Court that all matters between Plaintiff and Defendant have been resolved amicably. After consideration, the Court grants Plaintiff's motion to vacate and withdraw the memorandum opinion entered on March 1, 1988, 680 F. Supp. 1514. The Court directs Defendant to contact all publishers to notify them that the Court has withdrawn its opinion in this case. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the memorandum opinion entered on March 1, 1988 is withdrawn, and the final judgment is vacated. It is further

ORDERED that Defendant is directed to contact all publishers to notify them that the Court has withdrawn its opinion in this case in light of the amicable settlement between the parties. It is further

ORDERED that all pending motions for reconsideration are denied as moot.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer