Filed: Jul. 08, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 08, 2013
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH N. LAPLANTE, Chief District Judge. No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty dated The taxpayer, Steven J. Reddy, is ordered to appear on July 23, 2013, at 10:00 a.m., at the IRS office located at 1000 Elm Street, Manchester, New Hampshire, before Revenue Officer James Matheos (or any other authorized Revenue Officer of the IRS) to give testimony and produce all books and records in his possession or
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH N. LAPLANTE, Chief District Judge. No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty dated The taxpayer, Steven J. Reddy, is ordered to appear on July 23, 2013, at 10:00 a.m., at the IRS office located at 1000 Elm Street, Manchester, New Hampshire, before Revenue Officer James Matheos (or any other authorized Revenue Officer of the IRS) to give testimony and produce all books and records in his possession or c..
More
ORDER
JOSEPH N. LAPLANTE, Chief District Judge.
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty dated
The taxpayer, Steven J. Reddy, is ordered to appear on July 23, 2013, at 10:00 a.m., at the IRS office located at 1000 Elm Street, Manchester, New Hampshire, before Revenue Officer James Matheos (or any other authorized Revenue Officer of the IRS) to give testimony and produce all books and records in his possession or control required and called for by the terms of the summons of October 10, 2012. It is further ordered that the government be awarded its costs.
"`[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.'" School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).
SO ORDERED.
