PALERMO v. WRENN, 13-cv-232-JL. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. New Hampshire
Number: infdco20150413835
Visitors: 21
Filed: Mar. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 16, 2015
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ANDREA K. JOHNSTONE , Magistrate Judge . Before the court is defendants' motion to dismiss (doc. no. 14). No objection was filed by pro se plaintiff, Palermo. For the reasons set forth in defendants' motion (doc. no. 14): 1. damages claims under RLUIPA should be dismissed; 2. damages claims against defendants in their official capacities should be dismissed; and 3. damages claims against NHSP brought under 1983 should be dismissed. Any objections to this Rep
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ANDREA K. JOHNSTONE , Magistrate Judge . Before the court is defendants' motion to dismiss (doc. no. 14). No objection was filed by pro se plaintiff, Palermo. For the reasons set forth in defendants' motion (doc. no. 14): 1. damages claims under RLUIPA should be dismissed; 2. damages claims against defendants in their official capacities should be dismissed; and 3. damages claims against NHSP brought under 1983 should be dismissed. Any objections to this Repo..
More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ANDREA K. JOHNSTONE, Magistrate Judge.
Before the court is defendants' motion to dismiss (doc. no. 14). No objection was filed by pro se plaintiff, Palermo. For the reasons set forth in defendants' motion (doc. no. 14):
1. damages claims under RLUIPA should be dismissed;
2. damages claims against defendants in their official capacities should be dismissed; and
3. damages claims against NHSP brought under § 1983 should be dismissed.
Any objections to this Report and Recommendation must be filed within fourteen days of receipt of this notice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the district court's order. See United States v. De Jesús-Viera, 655 F.3d 52, 57 (1st Cir. 2011); Sch. Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 ((1st Cir. 2010).
Source: Leagle
