Filed: Mar. 11, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 11, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER FOR DISMISSAL ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), Plaintiff COMPUTERIZED SCREENING, INC., through its counsel of record, Armstrong Teasdale LLP, and Defendant STAYHEALTHY, INC., through its counsel of record, Holland & Hart LLP and Epps & Coulson LLP, hereby stipulate to dismissal of this action and all claims asserted herein with prejudice. Each party to bear its own costs. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO ORDERED
Summary: STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER FOR DISMISSAL ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), Plaintiff COMPUTERIZED SCREENING, INC., through its counsel of record, Armstrong Teasdale LLP, and Defendant STAYHEALTHY, INC., through its counsel of record, Holland & Hart LLP and Epps & Coulson LLP, hereby stipulate to dismissal of this action and all claims asserted herein with prejudice. Each party to bear its own costs. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO ORDERED ..
More
STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER FOR DISMISSAL
ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), Plaintiff COMPUTERIZED SCREENING, INC., through its counsel of record, Armstrong Teasdale LLP, and Defendant STAYHEALTHY, INC., through its counsel of record, Holland & Hart LLP and Epps & Coulson LLP, hereby stipulate to dismissal of this action and all claims asserted herein with prejudice. Each party to bear its own costs.
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO ORDERED.
