ORDER

NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC's Motion for Court Order Permitting Production of Records (Docket No. 137). The Court has considered Defendant's motion and finds there is no need for a response. Further, the Court finds this motion appropriately resolved without oral argument. Local Rule 78-2. For the reasons discussed below, Defendant's motion is hereby DENIED without prejudice.

I. FAILURE TO CITE POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

Defendant seeks a Court order "authorizing the release of Mr. Kwasnieski's employment records from Morgans and Hard Rock." Docket No. 137, at 9. Defendant has not, however, cited a single case or statute to support its request. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(d), "[t]he failure of a moving party to file points and authorities in support of the motion shall constitute a consent to the denial of the motion." LR 7-2. Accordingly, Defendant has consented to the denial of its motion.

Further, to the extent Defendant's motion was intended to be a motion to compel, Defendant failed to provide the text or responses to any of its written discovery requests. Local Rule 26-7(a) states that "[a]ll motions to compel discovery or for protective order shall set forth in full the text of the discovery originally sought and the response thereto, if any." LR 26-7(a). Therefore, by not providing the complete text of any discovery request, Defendant's motion fails to comply with the Local Rules. Additionally, the Court cannot determine that a particular response to a request for discovery was improper without knowing what request was made or what response was given.

II. CONCLUSION

Based on the foregoing, and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC's Motion for Court Order Permitting Production of Records (Docket No. 137) is DENIED without prejudice.