Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. YOUNG, 2:13-CR-00149-KJD-CWH. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20140318b76 Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 17, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 17, 2014
Summary: ORDER KENT J. DAWSON, District Judge. Before the Court is the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation (#42) regarding Defendants' Motions to Suppress (##25, 26). Defendants have been granted multiple extensions of time to file objections (## 44, 49). Ultimately, Defendants were given until March 11, 2014 to file any objections to the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation (#49). No objections have been filed. The Court's obligation is "to arrive at its own independent conclusion about tho
More

ORDER

KENT J. DAWSON, District Judge.

Before the Court is the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation (#42) regarding Defendants' Motions to Suppress (##25, 26). Defendants have been granted multiple extensions of time to file objections (## 44, 49). Ultimately, Defendants were given until March 11, 2014 to file any objections to the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation (#49). No objections have been filed.

The Court's obligation is "to arrive at its own independent conclusion about those portions of the magistrate's report to which objections are made."United States v. Remsing, 874 F.2d 614, 618 (9th Cir. 1989). Specifically, the Court is to engage in "de novo" review of the findings and recommendations objected to. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) (2012). As no objections have been made, the Court HEREBY ADOPTS and AFFIRMS the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer