QUIROZ v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, 2:13-cv-01288-APG-GWF. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20140321c86
Visitors: 21
Filed: Mar. 20, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 20, 2014
Summary: ORDER ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge. On September 24, 2013, Defendant U.S. Bank National Association ("U.S. Bank") filed a Motion to Dismiss. [Dkt. #15.] Pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(b) Plaintiff was required to file an opposition within fourteen (14) days thereafter. To date, no opposition has been filed. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(d), the "failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion." Notwiths
Summary: ORDER ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge. On September 24, 2013, Defendant U.S. Bank National Association ("U.S. Bank") filed a Motion to Dismiss. [Dkt. #15.] Pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(b) Plaintiff was required to file an opposition within fourteen (14) days thereafter. To date, no opposition has been filed. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(d), the "failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion." Notwithst..
More
ORDER
ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.
On September 24, 2013, Defendant U.S. Bank National Association ("U.S. Bank") filed a Motion to Dismiss. [Dkt. #15.] Pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(b) Plaintiff was required to file an opposition within fourteen (14) days thereafter. To date, no opposition has been filed. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(d), the "failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion." Notwithstanding that rule, the Court has reviewed the merits of the Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons set forth in that Motion, the Motion should be granted on its merits. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that U.S. Bank's Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. #15] is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice.
Source: Leagle
