MAE v. CREAGAN, 2:11-cv-00451-LDG (PAL). (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20140404b20
Visitors: 16
Filed: Mar. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2014
Summary: ORDER LLOYD D. GEORGE, District Judge. On December 16, 2013, the parties were ordered (## 41, 42) to show cause not later than January 3, 2014, why sanctions should not be imposed for their failure to timely file a joint pretrial order and their failure to comply with this Court's Order (#40). On January 3, 2014, the parties filed a joint status report indicating that they had come to a mutually agreeable resolution and were in the process of preparing the necessary settlement documents. The
Summary: ORDER LLOYD D. GEORGE, District Judge. On December 16, 2013, the parties were ordered (## 41, 42) to show cause not later than January 3, 2014, why sanctions should not be imposed for their failure to timely file a joint pretrial order and their failure to comply with this Court's Order (#40). On January 3, 2014, the parties filed a joint status report indicating that they had come to a mutually agreeable resolution and were in the process of preparing the necessary settlement documents. The p..
More
ORDER
LLOYD D. GEORGE, District Judge.
On December 16, 2013, the parties were ordered (## 41, 42) to show cause not later than January 3, 2014, why sanctions should not be imposed for their failure to timely file a joint pretrial order and their failure to comply with this Court's Order (#40). On January 3, 2014, the parties filed a joint status report indicating that they had come to a mutually agreeable resolution and were in the process of preparing the necessary settlement documents. The parties further indicated they expected to have this matter dismissed with prejudice within 30-45 days. Though more than 65 days have passed since that status report, the parties have not conformed to their expectation of having this matter dismissed. Accordingly,
THE COURT ORDERS that the parties shall indicate, in writing, no later than March 28, 2014, why they have not met their expectation to have this matter dismissed. The filing of a stipulation to dismiss with prejudice will satisfy the Court.
Source: Leagle
