Filed: Mar. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2014
Summary: ORDER NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge. On December 6, 2013, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss. Docket No. 9. The parties are required to file a discovery plan 44 days after a defendant's first appearance. See Local Rule 26-1(d). The filing of a motion to dismiss does not automatically stay discovery. See, e.g., Tradebay v. eBay, 278 F.R.D. 597, 600 (D. Nev. 2011). To date, a discovery plan has not been filed in this case. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS that, no later than March 28
Summary: ORDER NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge. On December 6, 2013, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss. Docket No. 9. The parties are required to file a discovery plan 44 days after a defendant's first appearance. See Local Rule 26-1(d). The filing of a motion to dismiss does not automatically stay discovery. See, e.g., Tradebay v. eBay, 278 F.R.D. 597, 600 (D. Nev. 2011). To date, a discovery plan has not been filed in this case. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS that, no later than March 28,..
More
ORDER
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
On December 6, 2013, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss. Docket No. 9. The parties are required to file a discovery plan 44 days after a defendant's first appearance. See Local Rule 26-1(d). The filing of a motion to dismiss does not automatically stay discovery. See, e.g., Tradebay v. eBay, 278 F.R.D. 597, 600 (D. Nev. 2011). To date, a discovery plan has not been filed in this case. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS that, no later than March 28, 2014, the parties file either a proposed discovery plan or a request to stay discovery.1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
