MONTES v. BANK OF AMERICA, 2:13-CV-00660-RCJ-VCF. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20140404h17
Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 03, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 03, 2014
Summary: ORDER ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge. The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate (ECF #49) entered on February 21, 2014, in which the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court deny without prejudice Jose Montes' Motion to Add Parties (ECF #25). The Court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record and has made a review and determination in accordance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. 636 and applica
Summary: ORDER ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge. The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate (ECF #49) entered on February 21, 2014, in which the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court deny without prejudice Jose Montes' Motion to Add Parties (ECF #25). The Court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record and has made a review and determination in accordance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. 636 and applicab..
More
ORDER
ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge.
The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate (ECF #49) entered on February 21, 2014, in which the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court deny without prejudice Jose Montes' Motion to Add Parties (ECF #25). The Court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record and has made a review and determination in accordance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable case law, and good cause appearing, the court hereby
ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (ECF #49).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Jose Montes' Motion to Add Parties (ECF #25) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
