Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BOSTON v. ROE, 2:95-cv-00254-PMP-CWH. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20140404h20 Visitors: 13
Filed: Apr. 03, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 03, 2014
Summary: ORDER PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge. For the reasons set forth in Respondents' Opposition (Doc. #53), IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner Boston's Motion to Reopen (Doc. #52) is DENIED.

ORDER

PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge.

For the reasons set forth in Respondents' Opposition (Doc. #53),

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner Boston's Motion to Reopen (Doc. #52) is DENIED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer