LOGAN v. PFIZER INC., 2:06-cv-00529-PMP-GWF. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20140421859
Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 18, 2014
Summary: ORDER PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge. Before the Court for consideration is Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #48) filed February 28, 2014. Although Plaintiff Sandra Logan has been advised of her obligation to timely respond to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgement ( See Doc. #52), Plaintiff has failed to file a response, and the time for doing so has expired. Additionally, having reviewed Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgement, the Court finds Defendants are entitled to the
Summary: ORDER PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge. Before the Court for consideration is Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #48) filed February 28, 2014. Although Plaintiff Sandra Logan has been advised of her obligation to timely respond to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgement ( See Doc. #52), Plaintiff has failed to file a response, and the time for doing so has expired. Additionally, having reviewed Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgement, the Court finds Defendants are entitled to the r..
More
ORDER
PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge.
Before the Court for consideration is Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #48) filed February 28, 2014. Although Plaintiff Sandra Logan has been advised of her obligation to timely respond to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgement (See Doc. #52), Plaintiff has failed to file a response, and the time for doing so has expired. Additionally, having reviewed Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgement, the Court finds Defendants are entitled to the relief requested on the merits.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment against Plaintiff Sandra Logan (Doc. #48) is GRANTED, and the Clerk of Court shall forthwith enter Judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff Sandra Logan.
Source: Leagle
