GRISHAM v. EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT FAMILY COURT OF CLARK COUNTY, 2:13-CV-2349 JCM (NJK). (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20140506e16
Visitors: 2
Filed: May 05, 2014
Latest Update: May 05, 2014
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge. Presently before the court is a motion to extend time filed by defendants The Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Division and Judge Vincent Ochoa. (Doc. # 27). Defendants request a four-day extension in which to file their reply in support of their motion for summary judgment. This is defendants' first request for an extension. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that defendants' motion to extend time (doc. # 27) be, an
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge. Presently before the court is a motion to extend time filed by defendants The Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Division and Judge Vincent Ochoa. (Doc. # 27). Defendants request a four-day extension in which to file their reply in support of their motion for summary judgment. This is defendants' first request for an extension. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that defendants' motion to extend time (doc. # 27) be, and..
More
ORDER
JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.
Presently before the court is a motion to extend time filed by defendants The Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Division and Judge Vincent Ochoa. (Doc. # 27).
Defendants request a four-day extension in which to file their reply in support of their motion for summary judgment. This is defendants' first request for an extension.
Good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that defendants' motion to extend time (doc. # 27) be, and at the same time hereby is, GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants shall have up to, and including, Friday, May 9, 2014, in which to file a reply regarding their summary judgment motion.
Source: Leagle
