PATEL-JULSON v. PAUL SMITH LAS VEGAS, INC., 2:12-cv-01023-APG-CWH. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20140512f86
Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 31, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 31, 2014
Summary: ORDER C. W. HOFFMAN, Jr., Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on the parties' Stipulation to Extend the Deadline for Dispositive Motions (#77), filed March 28, 2014. The stipulation does not comply with Local Rule 26-4. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties' Stipulation to Extend the Deadline for Dispositive Motions (#77) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in order to ensure future compliance with the Local Rules, all counsel of record listed on CM/ECF sh
Summary: ORDER C. W. HOFFMAN, Jr., Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on the parties' Stipulation to Extend the Deadline for Dispositive Motions (#77), filed March 28, 2014. The stipulation does not comply with Local Rule 26-4. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties' Stipulation to Extend the Deadline for Dispositive Motions (#77) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in order to ensure future compliance with the Local Rules, all counsel of record listed on CM/ECF sha..
More
ORDER
C. W. HOFFMAN, Jr., Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the parties' Stipulation to Extend the Deadline for Dispositive Motions (#77), filed March 28, 2014. The stipulation does not comply with Local Rule 26-4. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties' Stipulation to Extend the Deadline for Dispositive Motions (#77) is denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in order to ensure future compliance with the Local Rules, all counsel of record listed on CM/ECF shall individually submit a notice to the court by April 7, 2014 certifying that they have personally reviewed the requirements set forth in Local Rule 26-4.
Source: Leagle
