THOMAS v. COLVIN, 3:13-cv-00460-HDM-VPC. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20140611e79
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jun. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 10, 2014
Summary: ORDER HOWARD D. McKIBBEN, District Judge. The court has considered the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (#19) filed on May 13, 2013, in which the magistrate judge recommends that this court enter an order denying the plaintiff's motion for remand and/or reversal (#15) and granting the defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment (#17). Neither party objected to the report and recommendation. The court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and
Summary: ORDER HOWARD D. McKIBBEN, District Judge. The court has considered the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (#19) filed on May 13, 2013, in which the magistrate judge recommends that this court enter an order denying the plaintiff's motion for remand and/or reversal (#15) and granting the defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment (#17). Neither party objected to the report and recommendation. The court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and ..
More
ORDER
HOWARD D. McKIBBEN, District Judge.
The court has considered the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (#19) filed on May 13, 2013, in which the magistrate judge recommends that this court enter an order denying the plaintiff's motion for remand and/or reversal (#15) and granting the defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment (#17). Neither party objected to the report and recommendation. The court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record and has made a review and determination in accordance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable case law, and good cause appearing, the court hereby adopts and accepts the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (#19).
In accordance with the foregoing, the plaintiff's motion for remand and/or reversal (#15) is hereby DENIED and the defendant's cross-motion to affirm (#17) is hereby GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
