SPAHR v. ANDERSON, 3:12-cv-00209-LRH-WGC. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20140620d67
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 19, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 19, 2014
Summary: ORDER LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge. Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb (#49 1 ) entered on February 28, 2014, recommending granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#43) filed on September 23, 2013. Plaintiff filed his Objections to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#50) on March 13, 2014. Defendants filed their Response to Plaintiff's [#50] Objections to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#52) on March 2
Summary: ORDER LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge. Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb (#49 1 ) entered on February 28, 2014, recommending granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#43) filed on September 23, 2013. Plaintiff filed his Objections to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#50) on March 13, 2014. Defendants filed their Response to Plaintiff's [#50] Objections to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#52) on March 27..
More
ORDER
LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge.
Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb (#491) entered on February 28, 2014, recommending granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#43) filed on September 23, 2013. Plaintiff filed his Objections to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#50) on March 13, 2014. Defendants filed their Response to Plaintiff's [#50] Objections to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#52) on March 27, 2014. Plaintiff filed a reply (#53) on April 11, 2014. This action was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 1B 1-4 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.
The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections of the Plaintiff, the response of Defendants, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#49) entered on February 28, 2014, should be adopted and accepted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#49) entered on February 28, 2014, is adopted and accepted, and Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#43) is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Refers to court's docket number.
Source: Leagle
