Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

LARSEN v. PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY, 2:14-cv-00682-JCM-PAL. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20140630e16 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 26, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2014
Summary: ORDER PEGGY A. LEEN, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on the parties' failure to file a joint status report as required in Order (Dkt. #3) entered May 2, 2014, regarding removal of this case to federal district court. On May 8, 2014, Defendants filed a signed Statement (Dkt. #4) which complied with the court's order that the removing party file a statement providing the information specified. However, the parties have not submitted a joint status report regarding removal as re
More

ORDER

PEGGY A. LEEN, Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the court on the parties' failure to file a joint status report as required in Order (Dkt. #3) entered May 2, 2014, regarding removal of this case to federal district court. On May 8, 2014, Defendants filed a signed Statement (Dkt. #4) which complied with the court's order that the removing party file a statement providing the information specified. However, the parties have not submitted a joint status report regarding removal as required.

This matter is before also before the court on the parties' failure to file a Certificate as to Interested Parties as required by LR 7.1-1. The Complaint in this matter was filed in state court and removed (Dkt. #1) May 1, 2014. Defendants filed an Answer (Dkt. #6) May 21, 2014. LR 7.1-1(a) requires, unless otherwise ordered, that in all cases (except habeas corpus cases) pro se litigants and counsel for private parties shall, upon entering a case, identify in the disclosure statement required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships or corporations (including parent corporations) which have a direct, pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case. LR 7.1-1(b) further states that if there are no known interested parties, other than those participating in the case, a statement to that effect must be filed. Additionally, LR 7.1-1(c) requires a party to promptly file a supplemental certification upon any change in the information that this rule requires. To date, the parties have failed to comply. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED the parties shall file a joint status report no later than 4:00 p.m., July 1, 2014, which must:

1. Set forth the status of this action, including a list of any pending motions and/or other matters which require the attention of this court.

2. Include a statement by counsel of action required to be taken by this court.

3. Include as attachments copies of any pending motions, responses and replies thereto and/or any other matters requiring the court's attention not previously attached to the notice of removal.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file their Certificate as to Interested Parties, which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than 4:00 p.m., July 1, 2014. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer