WALKER DIGITAL TABLE SYSTEMS, LLC v. GAMING PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL CORP., 2:14-cv-00438-GMN-CWH. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20140714a76
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 10, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION, RELEASE, AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE GLORIA M. NAVARRO, District Judge. Plaintiffs Walker Digital Table Systems, LLC ("WDTS"); PJM Gaming Pty. Ltd. ("PJM Gaming"); and SATO Vicinity Pty. Ltd. ("SATO") (collectively "Plaintiffs") and Defendant Gaming Partners International Corp. ("GPI" or "Defendant") hereby stipulate to the dismissal, with prejudice, of all claims asserted by Plaintiffs against GPI in this action. Plaintiffs and GPI further stipulate that each shall bea
Summary: STIPULATION, RELEASE, AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE GLORIA M. NAVARRO, District Judge. Plaintiffs Walker Digital Table Systems, LLC ("WDTS"); PJM Gaming Pty. Ltd. ("PJM Gaming"); and SATO Vicinity Pty. Ltd. ("SATO") (collectively "Plaintiffs") and Defendant Gaming Partners International Corp. ("GPI" or "Defendant") hereby stipulate to the dismissal, with prejudice, of all claims asserted by Plaintiffs against GPI in this action. Plaintiffs and GPI further stipulate that each shall bear..
More
STIPULATION, RELEASE, AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
GLORIA M. NAVARRO, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Walker Digital Table Systems, LLC ("WDTS"); PJM Gaming Pty. Ltd. ("PJM Gaming"); and SATO Vicinity Pty. Ltd. ("SATO") (collectively "Plaintiffs") and Defendant Gaming Partners International Corp. ("GPI" or "Defendant") hereby stipulate to the dismissal, with prejudice, of all claims asserted by Plaintiffs against GPI in this action. Plaintiffs and GPI further stipulate that each shall bear their own attorneys' fees, expenses, and costs associated with the aforementioned claims.
GPI hereby releases Plaintiffs from any and all causes of action and liability arising or flowing from WDTS and PJM Gaming's termination of a July 21, 2009 Magellan-IGT Global Master License Agreement, including any subsequent termination of four 2010 agreements, specifically:
a) August 20, 2010 IGT-GPI RFID License and Transfer Agreement
b) August 20, 2010 IGT-WDTS RFID Operations Agreement
c) August 20, 2010 IGT-WDTS-GPIC Side Agreement to JGT-WDTS RFID License
d) August 20, 2010 GPI-WDTS Distribution and Product Purchase Agreement.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all claims asserted by Plaintiffs against GPI in this action are hereby dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41.
Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.
IT SO IS ORDERED.
Source: Leagle