Cox Communications Las Vegas, Inc. v. Zurich American Insurance Company, 2:13-CV-1483-GMN-NJK. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20140801k00
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jul. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 30, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge. The parties hereby jointly stipulate to extend the discovery deadlines in this matter, pursuant to Local Rule 26-4, respectfully showing as follows. The within Request is filed more than 21 days prior to the present discovery cut-off of: 1. Discovery completed to date: a. Initial disclosures of witnesses and documents by all parties; b. Supplement disclosures of witnesses and documents by all
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge. The parties hereby jointly stipulate to extend the discovery deadlines in this matter, pursuant to Local Rule 26-4, respectfully showing as follows. The within Request is filed more than 21 days prior to the present discovery cut-off of: 1. Discovery completed to date: a. Initial disclosures of witnesses and documents by all parties; b. Supplement disclosures of witnesses and documents by all p..
More
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
The parties hereby jointly stipulate to extend the discovery deadlines in this matter, pursuant to Local Rule 26-4, respectfully showing as follows. The within Request is filed more than 21 days prior to the present discovery cut-off of:
1. Discovery completed to date:
a. Initial disclosures of witnesses and documents by all parties;
b. Supplement disclosures of witnesses and documents by all parties;
c. Interrogatories and Requests to Produce to Plaintiff by Defendant, and responses thereto;
d. Interrogatories and Requests to Produce to Defendant by Plaintiff, and responses thereto;
e. Notices of depositions served on custodian of records, fact witnesses and FRCP 30(b)(6) witnesses;
f. Supplemental Interrogatories and Requests for Production;
g. Requests for Admissions.
2. Discovery remaining to be completed:
a. Completion of depositions of party representatives and fact witnesses
3. The reason discovery has not been completed:
Both parties have filed motions for summary judgment, and each party believes this case can be resolved in its favor as a matter of law. However, the parties have continued with discovery efforts, and numerous depositions have been noticed. Due to the number of depositions, the travel schedule of counsel, and the potential that some depositions may be conducted outside of Nevada, scheduling the depositions may prove difficult. As such, the parties request additional time to complete these depositions.
4. Proposed schedule for completing remaining discovery:
Discovery cut-off:
December 29, 2014
Last day to file dispositive motions:
January 28, 2015 (30 days after discovery cut-off)
Last day to file pre-trial order and FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(3) disclosures:
January 28, 2015, or 30 days after decision on any dispositive motions filed after the close of discovery
ORDER AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER
For good cause shown, and on the stipulation of the parties, the Scheduling Order in this matter is hereby amended consistent with the schedule agreed to by the parties in Paragraph 4 above.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
