PRISON LEGAL NEWS v. CRAWFORD, 3:00-cv-00373-HDM-WGC. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20140806b28
Visitors: 9
Filed: Aug. 05, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 05, 2014
Summary: ORDER HOWARD D. McKIBBEN, District Judge. 1. It is HEREBY ORDERED that the "Joint Motion to Vacate [89] Scheduling Order" (#102) filed by the parties on July 16, 2014, is GRANTED and the court's April 22, 2014, discovery plan and scheduling order (#89) is VACATED. 2. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants' responses to all outstanding written discovery (interrogatories, requests for production, and requests for admission) shall be provided to plaintiff's counsel within fourteen (14) days of th
Summary: ORDER HOWARD D. McKIBBEN, District Judge. 1. It is HEREBY ORDERED that the "Joint Motion to Vacate [89] Scheduling Order" (#102) filed by the parties on July 16, 2014, is GRANTED and the court's April 22, 2014, discovery plan and scheduling order (#89) is VACATED. 2. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants' responses to all outstanding written discovery (interrogatories, requests for production, and requests for admission) shall be provided to plaintiff's counsel within fourteen (14) days of the..
More
ORDER
HOWARD D. McKIBBEN, District Judge.
1. It is HEREBY ORDERED that the "Joint Motion to Vacate [89] Scheduling Order" (#102) filed by the parties on July 16, 2014, is GRANTED and the court's April 22, 2014, discovery plan and scheduling order (#89) is VACATED.
2. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants' responses to all outstanding written discovery (interrogatories, requests for production, and requests for admission) shall be provided to plaintiff's counsel within fourteen (14) days of the date the court rules on defendants' motion to dismiss (#92).
3. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the parties conduct a scheduling conference to establish a new proposed scheduling order and submit the same to the court within thirty (30) days of the court's ruling on defendants' motion to dismiss (#92).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
