U.S. v. JOHNSON, 2:-6-cr-13-RLH-RJJ. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20140826a35
Visitors: 14
Filed: Aug. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 25, 2014
Summary: ORDER DENYING APPEALABILITY ROGER L. HUNT, District Judge. Following the Court's denial of Defendant's Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255, ( see #112), Defendant Johnson filed a Notice of Appeal. (#114). Pursuant to Ninth Circuit policy, the Circuit has remanded this case for the limited purpose of granting or denying a Certificate of Appealability. This court will not enter a certificate of appealability because, as noted in the order of denial, Defendant has not sought or obtained per
Summary: ORDER DENYING APPEALABILITY ROGER L. HUNT, District Judge. Following the Court's denial of Defendant's Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255, ( see #112), Defendant Johnson filed a Notice of Appeal. (#114). Pursuant to Ninth Circuit policy, the Circuit has remanded this case for the limited purpose of granting or denying a Certificate of Appealability. This court will not enter a certificate of appealability because, as noted in the order of denial, Defendant has not sought or obtained perm..
More
ORDER DENYING APPEALABILITY
ROGER L. HUNT, District Judge.
Following the Court's denial of Defendant's Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, (see #112), Defendant Johnson filed a Notice of Appeal. (#114). Pursuant to Ninth Circuit policy, the Circuit has remanded this case for the limited purpose of granting or denying a Certificate of Appealability.
This court will not enter a certificate of appealability because, as noted in the order of denial, Defendant has not sought or obtained permission to file his second § 2255 motion, and the motion is otherwise untimely.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this court will not issue a certificate of appealability in this matter.
Source: Leagle
