Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

PASCHALL v. COLVIN, 2:13-cv-1453-JAD-NJK. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20140827b52 Visitors: 9
Filed: Aug. 26, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 26, 2014
Summary: Order Adopting Report and Recommendation [Doc. 24], Denying Motion to Remand [Doc. 20] and Granting Commissioner's Cross-Motion to Affirm [Doc. 22] JENNIFER A. DORSEY, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Nancy Koppe entered a report and recommendation on August 5, 2014, recommending that plaintiff John Paschall's motion to remand be denied, and that the Commissioner's Cross-Motion to Affirm be granted. Doc. 24. Objections were due August 22, 2014. Paschall has filed no objection. "[N]o review is
More

Order Adopting Report and Recommendation [Doc. 24], Denying Motion to Remand [Doc. 20] and Granting Commissioner's Cross-Motion to Affirm [Doc. 22]

JENNIFER A. DORSEY, District Judge.

Magistrate Judge Nancy Koppe entered a report and recommendation on August 5, 2014, recommending that plaintiff John Paschall's motion to remand be denied, and that the Commissioner's Cross-Motion to Affirm be granted. Doc. 24. Objections were due August 22, 2014. Paschall has filed no objection. "[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation unless objections are filed." Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003). See also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).

Accordingly, and with good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Koppe's report and recommendation [Doc. 24] is ADOPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff John Paschall's motion to remand [Doc. 20] is DENIED, and that the Commissioner's Cross-Motion to Affirm [Doc. 22] is GRANTED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer