Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. INTELIGENTRY, LTD., 2:13-cv-00344-RFB-NJK. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20140917e60 Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 15, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 15, 2014
Summary: ORDER (Docket No. 190) NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge. Presently before the Court is Defendant John Rohner's Motion to Provide a Court Order to Provide Banking Records and Business Records for Michael G. Girouard, Unity International and All Others Associated with Same. Docket No. 190. The Court has considered Defendant's motion, Plaintiff's opposition, and Defendant's response. Docket Nos. 190, 199, 205. The Court finds that this motion is appropriately resolved without oral argument. See
More

ORDER

(Docket No. 190)

NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.

Presently before the Court is Defendant John Rohner's Motion to Provide a Court Order to Provide Banking Records and Business Records for Michael G. Girouard, Unity International and All Others Associated with Same. Docket No. 190. The Court has considered Defendant's motion, Plaintiff's opposition, and Defendant's response. Docket Nos. 190, 199, 205. The Court finds that this motion is appropriately resolved without oral argument. See Local Rule 78-2.

BACKGROUND

On March 28, 2014, pro se Defendant John Rohner filed his Motion to Provide a Court Order to Provide Banking Records and Business Records for Michael G. Girouard, Unity International and All Others Associated with Same. Docket No. 190. Rohner is requesting the Court to release "all records from any financial institution associated or belonging to Michael G. Girouard and his businesses and his Unity International business from January 1, 2009 to current." Id., at 1. Rohner represents that this information will be necessary if PlasmERG, Inc. (Nevada) is liable as successor in interest for the activities of PlasmERG, Inc. (Iowa). Id., at 3-4.

DISCUSSION

Defendant Rohner has not indicated under what rule or authority he believes the Court should act. If Rohner is requesting that the Court compel the SEC to produce additional documentation under Rule 37, he has not shown that there is an outstanding discovery request and that he properly met and conferred with the SEC prior to bringing his motion. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(a)(2)(B); LR 26-7(b); ShuffleMaster, Inc. v. Progressive Games, Inc., 170 F.R.D. 166, 171 (D. Nev. 1996). Pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(d), "[t]he failure of a moving party to file points and authorities in support of the motion shall constitute a consent to the denial of the motion." The Court has previously warned Rohner that such a failure may result in a denial of the motion. See Docket No. 113, at 3. Accordingly, as the Court cannot identify under what authority Rohner is requesting relief in the present motion, his motion is denied.

CONCLUSION

Based on the foregoing, and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant John Rohner's Motion to Provide a Court Order to Provide Banking Records and Business Records for Michael G. Girouard, Unity International and All Others Associated with Same (Docket No. 190) is DENIED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer