Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

VITALE v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, 2:12-CV-2010 JCM (GWF). (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20141010a14 Visitors: 6
Filed: Oct. 09, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 09, 2014
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge. Presently before the court is plaintiff Salvatore H. Vitale IV's unopposed motion for the court to enter judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58(d). (Doc. #36). Defendant did not file a response, and the deadline to respond has now passed. On June 17, 2014, the court adopted Magistrate Judge Foley's report and recommendation, (doc. #27), and granted plaintiff's motion to remand the matter to the Social Security Administration, (doc. #19).
More

ORDER

JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.

Presently before the court is plaintiff Salvatore H. Vitale IV's unopposed motion for the court to enter judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58(d). (Doc. #36). Defendant did not file a response, and the deadline to respond has now passed.

On June 17, 2014, the court adopted Magistrate Judge Foley's report and recommendation, (doc. #27), and granted plaintiff's motion to remand the matter to the Social Security Administration, (doc. #19). On the same date, the clerk closed the case.

Plaintiff now asks the court to enter a judgment so that he can move for attorney's fees. (Doc. #36). Plaintiff contends that such a motion would not be ripe until the court has entered a judgment.

While the court granted plaintiff's motion to remand, no actual judgment was rendered in this case. Therefore, entry of a judgment for plaintiff is not warranted at this time.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff's motion to enter judgment, (doc. #36), be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer