BOLDEN v. STATE, 3:13-cv-00543-MMD-WGC. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20141017a87
Visitors: 6
Filed: Oct. 16, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 16, 2014
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge. Mail to plaintiff has been returned (dkt. nos. 17, 18) with the notation that plaintiff has been discharged from prison. The Attorney General has filed a notice (dkt. no. 20) indicating that plaintiff has been discharged and that his current address is unknown. Plaintiff has failed to comply with local rule LSR 2-2, which requires him to promptly inform the Court of any changes in address. It is therefore ordered that this action is dismissed without preju
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge. Mail to plaintiff has been returned (dkt. nos. 17, 18) with the notation that plaintiff has been discharged from prison. The Attorney General has filed a notice (dkt. no. 20) indicating that plaintiff has been discharged and that his current address is unknown. Plaintiff has failed to comply with local rule LSR 2-2, which requires him to promptly inform the Court of any changes in address. It is therefore ordered that this action is dismissed without prejud..
More
ORDER
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
Mail to plaintiff has been returned (dkt. nos. 17, 18) with the notation that plaintiff has been discharged from prison. The Attorney General has filed a notice (dkt. no. 20) indicating that plaintiff has been discharged and that his current address is unknown. Plaintiff has failed to comply with local rule LSR 2-2, which requires him to promptly inform the Court of any changes in address.
It is therefore ordered that this action is dismissed without prejudice for plaintiff's failure to inform the Court of his current address. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly.
It is further ordered that an appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith.
Source: Leagle
