INGEBRETSEN v. PALMER, 3:07-cv-00251-LRH-RAM. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20141021l34
Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 07, 2014
Summary: ORDER LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge. The court stayed this action to allow petitioner to exhaust his available state court remedies. Order (#97). Petitioner has filed a motion to reopen (#101), stating that his proceedings in state court have concluded. Respondents do not oppose the motion (#103). The court grants this motion. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's motion to lift the stay (#101) is GRANTED. This action is REINSTATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have
Summary: ORDER LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge. The court stayed this action to allow petitioner to exhaust his available state court remedies. Order (#97). Petitioner has filed a motion to reopen (#101), stating that his proceedings in state court have concluded. Respondents do not oppose the motion (#103). The court grants this motion. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's motion to lift the stay (#101) is GRANTED. This action is REINSTATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have ..
More
ORDER
LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge.
The court stayed this action to allow petitioner to exhaust his available state court remedies. Order (#97). Petitioner has filed a motion to reopen (#101), stating that his proceedings in state court have concluded. Respondents do not oppose the motion (#103). The court grants this motion.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's motion to lift the stay (#101) is GRANTED. This action is REINSTATED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have forty-five (45) days from the date on which this order is entered to answer or otherwise respond to the third amended petition (#87). If respondents file and serve an answer, then they shall comply with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, and then petitioner shall have forty-five (45) days from the date on which the answer is served to file a reply.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the exhibits filed in the court's docket at #102 shall be considered as additional exhibits to the third amended petition.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, from this date forward, the hard copy of any exhibits shall be forwarded—for this case—to the staff attorneys in Las Vegas.
Source: Leagle
