DOE v. JBF RAK LLC, 2:14-cv-00979-RFB-GWF. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20141031d12
Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 30, 2014
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, Jr., Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (#69), filed on October 29, 2014. Plaintiff has submitted a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order, but represents that Defendants object to discovery commencing while their motions to dismiss are pending. Defendants are admonished that the filing of a motion to dismiss does not automatically result in a stay of discovery or the requirement to file a dis
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, Jr., Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (#69), filed on October 29, 2014. Plaintiff has submitted a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order, but represents that Defendants object to discovery commencing while their motions to dismiss are pending. Defendants are admonished that the filing of a motion to dismiss does not automatically result in a stay of discovery or the requirement to file a disc..
More
ORDER
GEORGE FOLEY, Jr., Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (#69), filed on October 29, 2014. Plaintiff has submitted a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order, but represents that Defendants object to discovery commencing while their motions to dismiss are pending. Defendants are admonished that the filing of a motion to dismiss does not automatically result in a stay of discovery or the requirement to file a discovery plan and scheduling order. If Defendants desire a stay of discovery, then they must file a motion for stay, or a stipulation setting forth the justification for entry of a stay order. Because Defendants' motion to dismiss challenges personal jurisdiction over the Defendants in this district, however, it is the type of motion for which a stay of discovery may be granted. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall file an appropriate motion to stay discovery on or before November 7, 2014, or shall file a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order by the same date.
Source: Leagle
