Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CYBERGUN S.A. v. JAG PRECISION, INC., 2:12-cv-00074-APG-GWF. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20150123h52 Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 18, 2014
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL JAG'S (1) REPLY ISO JAG'S MSJ/SA; (2) RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STRIKE; AND (3) RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO EXCLUDE ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge. Defendant filed its Motion to File Under Seal JAG's (1) Defendant's Reply In Support Of Defendant's Motion For Summary Judgment, Or In The Alternative, Summary Adjudication; (2) Defendant's Response To Plaintiffs' Motion To Strike Previously Undisclosed Witness, Chris Butler, And Previously U
More

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL JAG'S (1) REPLY ISO JAG'S MSJ/SA; (2) RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STRIKE; AND (3) RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO EXCLUDE

ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.

Defendant filed its Motion to File Under Seal JAG's (1) Defendant's Reply In Support Of Defendant's Motion For Summary Judgment, Or In The Alternative, Summary Adjudication; (2) Defendant's Response To Plaintiffs' Motion To Strike Previously Undisclosed Witness, Chris Butler, And Previously Undisclosed Documents; And (3) Defendant's Response To Plaintiffs' Motion In Limine To Exclude Expert Testimony From Howard Kent and Related Documents ("Motion") on April 3, 2014. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, finds that there is good cause to seal (1) Defendant's Reply In Support Of Defendant's Motion For Summary Judgment, Or In The Alternative, Summary Adjudication; (2) Defendant's Response To Plaintiffs' Motion To Strike Previously Undisclosed Witness, Chris Butler, And Previously Undisclosed Documents; And (3) Defendant's Response To Plaintiffs' Motion In Limine To Exclude Expert Testimony From Howard Kent and Related Documents from the general public. Accordingly:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to File Documents Under Seal is GRANTED. JAG's (1) Defendant's Reply In Support Of Defendant's Motion For Summary Judgment, Or In The Alternative, Summary Adjudication; (2) Defendant's Response To Plaintiffs' Motion To Strike Previously Undisclosed Witness, Chris Butler, And Previously Undisclosed Documents; And (3) Defendant's Response To Plaintiffs' Motion In Limine To Exclude Expert Testimony From Howard Kent and Exhibits 1 and 2 to the Declaration of David K. Lin shall be sealed by the Clerk of the Court and such documentation shall not be open to inspection except to the parties or their attorneys, or until further order of this Court.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer