Elawyers Elawyers
Virginia| Change

In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litigation, 14-MD-2543 (JMF). (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. New York Number: infdco20191202966 Visitors: 36
Attorneys: More Attorneys
Filed: Nov. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 26, 2019
Summary: BAILEY COWAN HECKAMAN PLLC AND POTTS LAW FIRM'S MOTION FOR ORDER PERMITTING UNDER SEAL AND IN CAMERA SUBMISSION OF EXHIBITS TO THE FIRMS' CONSOLIDATED REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ON ASSESSMENTS (ECF. NO. 7369) JESSE M. FURMAN , District Judge . In connection with this Court's November 15, 2019 Order (ECF 7406) requiring Bailey Cowan Heckaman PLLC ("BCH") and Potts Law Firm ("Potts") (collectively the "Firms") to jointly file their reply in support of thei
More

BAILEY COWAN HECKAMAN PLLC AND POTTS LAW FIRM'S MOTION FOR ORDER PERMITTING UNDER SEAL AND IN CAMERA SUBMISSION OF EXHIBITS TO THE FIRMS' CONSOLIDATED REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ON ASSESSMENTS (ECF. NO. 7369)

In connection with this Court's November 15, 2019 Order (ECF 7406) requiring Bailey Cowan Heckaman PLLC ("BCH") and Potts Law Firm ("Potts") (collectively the "Firms") to jointly file their reply in support of their Motions for Declaratory Judgment, the Firms respectfully request an Order permitting the Firms to file portions of, and certain exhibits to, the Firms' Consolidated Reply in Support of Their Motion for Declaratory Judgment on Assessments ("Consolidated Reply") for certain of the Firms' state-court filed and unfiled cases, under seal and in camera. Specifically, the Firms request permission to: (1) file fully under seal and in camera Exhibits A-C & E to the Firms' Consolidated Reply in Support of their Motion for Declaratory Judgment on Assessments (hereinafter the "Firms' Reply"); and (2) file in partially redacted form the Firms' Reply to protect the attorney work product and otherwise confidential information about settlements cited therein. Because the above-referenced exhibits and certain redactions in the Consolidated Reply reflect attorney work product, the Firms respectfully request that the Court permit the Firms to submit said filings under seal and in camera (that is, filing under seal and submission to the Court by email without disclosure to New GM). The Firms are contemporaneously filing a Memorandum in Support of this Motion.

Application GRANTED temporarily. The Court will assess the propriety of the sealing and redactions when deciding the underlying motions. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate 14-MD-2543, ECF No. 7505. SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer