Filed: Feb. 20, 1812
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: 11 U.S. 107 (1812) 7 Cranch 107 HAWTHORNE, CLAIMANT OF THE BRIG CLARISSA CLAIBORNE v. THE UNITED STATES. Supreme Court of United States. February 20, 1812. Present ... . . All the Judges. *108 HARE, Moved for a certiorari upon a suggestion of diminution of the record. MARSHALL, Ch. J. What prevents you from producing the witnesses here, or taking their depositions de novo. HARE, Suggested a doubt, whether cases for violation of the Embargo, are cases of admiralty, or of prize jurisdiction. Howev
Summary: 11 U.S. 107 (1812) 7 Cranch 107 HAWTHORNE, CLAIMANT OF THE BRIG CLARISSA CLAIBORNE v. THE UNITED STATES. Supreme Court of United States. February 20, 1812. Present ... . . All the Judges. *108 HARE, Moved for a certiorari upon a suggestion of diminution of the record. MARSHALL, Ch. J. What prevents you from producing the witnesses here, or taking their depositions de novo. HARE, Suggested a doubt, whether cases for violation of the Embargo, are cases of admiralty, or of prize jurisdiction. Howeve..
More
11 U.S. 107 (1812)
7 Cranch 107
HAWTHORNE, CLAIMANT OF THE BRIG CLARISSA CLAIBORNE
v.
THE UNITED STATES.
Supreme Court of United States.
February 20, 1812.
Present ... . . All the Judges.
HARE, Moved for a certiorari upon a suggestion of diminution of the record.
MARSHALL, Ch. J.
What prevents you from producing the witnesses here, or taking their depositions de novo.
HARE, Suggested a doubt, whether cases for violation of the Embargo, are cases of admiralty, or of prize jurisdiction.
However, on a subsequent day he moved for, and obtained a commission to take the depositions of witnesses at New Orleans, to be used on the trial in this Court, at the next term.
A like commission was granted in the case of Williams and Armroyd, at this term.
