Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hawthorne, of the Brig Clarissa Claiborne v. The United States, (1812)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 
Filed: Feb. 01, 1812
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 11 U.S. 107 7 Cranch 107 3 L. Ed. 284 HAWTHORNE, CLAIMANT OF THE BRIG CLARISSA CLAIBORNE v. THE UNITED STATES. February 20, 1812 1 Present All the Judges . 2 THIS was an appeal from the sentence of the District Court, at New Orleans, condemning the Brig Clarissa Claiborne , for violating a law of the United States. 3 HARE, Moved for a certiorari upon a suggestion of diminution of the record, in not sending up the depositions of the witnesseses. 4 MARSHALL, Ch. J. 5 What prevents you from produci
More

11 U.S. 107

7 Cranch 107

3 L. Ed. 284

HAWTHORNE, CLAIMANT OF THE BRIG CLARISSA CLAIBORNE
v.
THE UNITED STATES.

February 20, 1812

1

Present All the Judges.

2

THIS was an appeal from the sentence of the District Court, at New Orleans, condemning the Brig Clarissa Claiborne, for violating a law of the United States.

3

HARE, Moved for a certiorari upon a suggestion of diminution of the record, in not sending up the depositions of the witnesseses.

4

MARSHALL, Ch. J.

5

What prevents you from producing the witnesses here, or taking their depositions de novo.

6

HARE, Suggested a doubt, whether cases for violation of the Embargo, are cases of admiralty, or of prize jurisdiction.

7

However, on a subsequent day he moved for, and obtained a commission to take the depositions of wtnesses at New Orleans, to be used on the trial in this Court, at the next term.

8

A like commission was granted in the case of Williams and Armroyd, at this term.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer