Filed: Feb. 25, 1814
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 12 U.S. 84 8 Cranch 84 3 L. Ed. 495 GRACIE v. THE MARY'D. INS. COMP'Y. Feb. Term, 1814 1 This case differs from that against the Marine Insurance Company of Baltimore * only in one particular. A part of the cargo 2 remained on board the ship until the arrival of the French troops 3 when the departure of the vessel was prohibited by the general and 4 the ransom made. 5 This circumstance does not, in the opinion of the Court, vary 6 the case; because, omitting all other considerations, the loss, w
Summary: 12 U.S. 84 8 Cranch 84 3 L. Ed. 495 GRACIE v. THE MARY'D. INS. COMP'Y. Feb. Term, 1814 1 This case differs from that against the Marine Insurance Company of Baltimore * only in one particular. A part of the cargo 2 remained on board the ship until the arrival of the French troops 3 when the departure of the vessel was prohibited by the general and 4 the ransom made. 5 This circumstance does not, in the opinion of the Court, vary 6 the case; because, omitting all other considerations, the loss, wi..
More
12 U.S. 84
8 Cranch 84
3 L. Ed. 495
GRACIE
v.
THE MARY'D. INS. COMP'Y.
Feb. Term, 1814
1
This case differs from that against the Marine Insurance
Company of Baltimore only in one particular. A part of the cargo
2
remained on board the ship until the arrival of the French troops
3
when the departure of the vessel was prohibited by the general and
5
This circumstance does not, in the opinion of the Court, vary
6
the case; because, omitting all other considerations, the loss, within the risk, being on only a part of the cargo, is a partial loss, and is affected by the warranty against particular average loss.
7
This judgment is also to be affirmed with costs.
