Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Nichols, Shepard & Co. v. Marsh, 95 (1889)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 95 Visitors: 1
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Apr. 01, 1889
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 131 U.S. 401 (1889) NICHOLS, SHEPARD AND COMPANY v. MARSH. No. 95. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted March 18, 1889. Decided April 1, 1889. ORIGINAL MOTION IN A CASE BROUGHT UP BY APPEAL. *402 Mr. Charles F. Burton for the motion. Mr. R.A. Parker opposing. *403 PER CURIAM: On consideration of the motion for a retaxation of costs in this cause, and of the argument of counsel thereupon, had as well in support of as against the same: It is now here ordered by the court that the amount advan
More
131 U.S. 401 (1889)

NICHOLS, SHEPARD AND COMPANY
v.
MARSH.

No. 95.

Supreme Court of United States.

Submitted March 18, 1889.
Decided April 1, 1889.
ORIGINAL MOTION IN A CASE BROUGHT UP BY APPEAL.

*402 Mr. Charles F. Burton for the motion.

Mr. R.A. Parker opposing.

*403 PER CURIAM:

On consideration of the motion for a retaxation of costs in this cause, and of the argument of counsel thereupon, had as well in support of as against the same:

It is now here ordered by the court that the amount advanced by the appellants in this cause towards printing the record be recoverable by them from the appellees herein.

[This order is entitled only in the cross-suit of Nichols v. Marsh.]

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer