132 U.S. 216 (1889) BROWN v. RANK. No. 99. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted November 13, 1889. Decided November 25, 1889. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF WASHINGTON. *217 Mr. Leander Holmes, for appellants, submitted on his brief. Mr. W.W. Upton and Mr. A.H. Garland, for appellee, submitted on their brief. MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER delivered the opinion of the court. Appellants commenced a possessory action, in the nature of ejectment, against appellee, in the District...
129 U.S. 663 (1889) RALSTON v. TURPIN. No. 98. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 26, 27, 1888. Decided March 5, 1889. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. *664 Mr. W. Dessau and Mr. Clifford Anderson for appellant. Mr. A.O. Bacon and Mr. John C. Rutherford for appellees. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court. This suit was brought by the widow of the late James A. Ralston, Jr., to obtain a decree cancelling...
132 U.S. 252 (1889) PICKHARDT v. MERRITT. No. 97. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 12, 13, 1889. Decided December 2, 1889. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Mr. Benjamin F. Thurston and Mr. Livingston Gifford for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Solicitor General for defendant in error. MR. JUSTICE BLATCHFORD delivered the opinion of the court. This is an action at law, brought in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern...
129 U.S. 238 (1889) BROWN v. SUTTON. No. 97. Supreme Court of United States. Argued and submitted November 26, 1888. Decided January 28, 1889. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. *239 Mr. Erastus F. Brown (with whom was Mr. Edgar K. Brown on the brief) for appellants. Mr. Edwin Hurlbut and Mr. Winfield Smith, for appellee, submitted on their brief. MR. JUSTICE MILLER delivered the opinion of the court. The bill was brought by Sarah S. Sutton,...
132 U.S. 207 (1889) WINTERS v. ETHELL. No. 96. Supreme Court of United States. Argued and submitted November 12, 1889. Decided November 25, 1889. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF IDAHO. Mr. M. Kirkpatrick, for appellants, submitted on his brief. Mr. Samuel Shellabarger (with whom was Mr. Jeremiah M. Wilson on the brief) for appellees. MR. JUSTICE BLATCHFORD delivered the opinion of the court. This is a suit brought in the District Court of the Second Judicial District of Idaho...
131 U.S. 401 (1889) NICHOLS, SHEPARD AND COMPANY v. MARSH. No. 95. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted March 18, 1889. Decided April 1, 1889. ORIGINAL MOTION IN A CASE BROUGHT UP BY APPEAL. *402 Mr. Charles F. Burton for the motion. Mr. R.A. Parker opposing. *403 PER CURIAM: On consideration of the motion for a retaxation of costs in this cause, and of the argument of counsel thereupon, had as well in support of as against the same: It is now here ordered by the court that the amount...
129 U.S. 58 (1889) WALLACE v. JOHNSTONE. No. 94. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 23, 1888. Decided January 14, 1889. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA. Mr. George Norris for appellant. Mr. James Hagerman, with whom was Mr. Joseph G. Anderson for appellees. *59 MR. JUSTICE LAMAR delivered the opinion of the court. This is a suit in equity originally brought in a state court by the appellees against the appellant and one E.R. Ford,...
129 U.S. 104 (1889) FARNSWORTH v. TERRITORY OF MONTANA. No. 93. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 23, 1888. Decided January 14, 1889. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF MONTANA. *105 Mr. James Lowndes, for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error. *109 MR. JUSTICE BLATCHFORD, after stating the case as above reported, delivered the opinion of the court. It is very clear that this is a criminal case; and the question arises whether there is any authority...
132 U.S. 501 (1889) MULLER v. NORTON. No. 91. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 8, 11, 1889. Decided December 9, 1889. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. *503 Mr. W. Hallett Phillips for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Sawnie Robertson also filed a brief for same. Mr. D.A. McKnight (with whom was Mr. John Johns on the brief) for defendants in error. *505 MR. JUSTICE LAMAR, after stating the case as above reported, delivered the opinion of...
132 U.S. 39 (1889) BRUSH v. CONDIT. No. 9. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 15, 16, 1889. Decided November 4, 1889. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Mr. W.H. Kenyon for appellants. Mr. W.C. Witter was with him on the brief. Mr. Edmund Wetmore for appellees. Mr. S.A. Duncan was with him on the brief. MR. JUSTICE BLATCHFORD delivered the opinion of the court. This is an appeal by the plaintiffs, Charles F. Brush and The Brush...
132 U.S. 295 (1889) CLEVELAND v. KING. No. 89. Supreme Court of United States. Argued and submitted November 8, 1889. Decided November 25, 1889. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. *301 Mr. Allan T. Brinsmade, for plaintiff in error. Mr. E.K. Wilcox, (with whom was Mr. Richard Bacon, ) for defendant in error. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court. *302 By section 2640 of the Revised Statutes of Ohio, Title,...
132 U.S. 192 (1889) RAIMOND v. TERREBONNE PARISH. No. 88. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 12, 1889. Decided November 25, 1889. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. *194 Mr. Alfred Goldthwaite for plaintiff in error. Mr. J.D. Rouse and Mr. William Grant for defendant in error. MR. JUSTICE GRAY, after stating the case as above, delivered the opinion of the court. Assuming the agreement in writing, waiving a jury, and submitting the...
129 U.S. 294 (1889) PATTEE PLOW COMPANY v. KINGMAN. No. 88. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 16, 19, 1888. Decided February 4, 1889. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. *295 Mr. John R. Bennett for appellant. Mr. L.L. Bond for appellees. Mr. E.A. West was with him on the brief. MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER delivered the opinion of the court. This is an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern...
131 U.S. 396 (1889) CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILWAY COMPANY v. GRAY. No. 876. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted March 11, 1889. Decided March 18, 1889. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA. *397 Mr. John F. Lacey for the motion. PER CURIAM: This case is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Dismissed.
129 U.S. 170 (1889) HILL v. CHICAGO AND EVANSTON RAILROAD COMPANY. No. 866. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted December 20, 1888. Decided January 21, 1889. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. *171 Mr. E. Walker and Mr. W.C. Goudy for the motions. Mr. Gordon E. Cole opposing. MR. JUSTICE BLATCHFORD delivered the opinion of the court. In this case, on the 8th of June, 1885, a decree was made by the court below in the following language:...
129 U.S. 151 (1889) BATE REFRIGERATING COMPANY v. HAMMOND. No. 862. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 2, 3, 4, 1889. Decided January 21, 1889. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. *157 Mr. Clarence A. Seward, with whom was Mr. John Lowell and Mr. Richard N. Dyer on the brief, opened for appellant. Mr. Noah Davis, by leave of court, filed a brief on behalf of the Edison Electric Light Company, in support of appellant. Mr. Benjamin F....
129 U.S. 128 (1889) INMAN v. SOUTH CAROLINA RAILWAY COMPANY. No. 86. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 15, 16, 1888. Decided January 14, 1889. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. *136 Mr. George A. Black for plaintiffs in error. Mr. William Allen Butler and Mr. Theodore G. Barker for defendant in error. *138 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court. The defendant, a corporation of South...
132 U.S. 264 (1889) DAHL v. MONTANA COPPER COMPANY. No. 86. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted November 7, 1889. Decided November 25, 1889. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF MONTANA. Mr. William H. De Witt, for plaintiff in error, submitted on his brief. No appearance for defendant in error. MR. JUSTICE FIELD delivered the opinion of the court. This is an action to quiet the title to certain placer mining ground, twenty acres in extent, in Silver Bow County, Montana, claimed...
129 U.S. 372 (1889) BANK OF FORT MADISON v. ALDEN. No. 853. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted January 4, 1889. Decided February 4, 1889. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. *373 Mr. Henry Strong and Mr. Theodore Sheldon, for appellant. Mr. John P. Wilson, for appellees. MR. JUSTICE FIELD delivered the opinion of the court. The Bank of Fort Madison, the complainant below, the appellant here, is a corporation organized under the laws...
132 U.S. 260 (1889) DAHL v. RAUNHEIM. No. 85. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted November 7, 1889. Decided November 25, 1889. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF MONTANA. Mr. William H. De Witt, for plaintiff in error, submitted on his brief. No appearance for defendant in error. MR. JUSTICE FIELD delivered the opinion of the court. This is an action to quiet the title of the plaintiff below to certain placer mining ground, forty acres in extent, situated *261 in Silver Bow...
