Hohensee v. News Syndicate, Inc., 227 M (1962)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number: 227 M
Visitors: 16
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Jun. 11, 1962
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 369 U.S. 659 (1962) HOHENSEE v. NEWS SYNDICATE, INC. No. 214. Supreme Court of United States. Decided May 14, 1962. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. James C. Newton for petitioner. Stuart N. Updike for respondent. PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Goldlawr, Inc., v. Heiman, ante, p. 463. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART,
Summary: 369 U.S. 659 (1962) HOHENSEE v. NEWS SYNDICATE, INC. No. 214. Supreme Court of United States. Decided May 14, 1962. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. James C. Newton for petitioner. Stuart N. Updike for respondent. PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Goldlawr, Inc., v. Heiman, ante, p. 463. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART, ..
More
369 U.S. 659 (1962)
HOHENSEE
v.
NEWS SYNDICATE, INC.
No. 214.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided May 14, 1962.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT.
James C. Newton for petitioner.
Stuart N. Updike for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Goldlawr, Inc., v. Heiman, ante, p. 463.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART, for the reasons given in their dissent in the Goldlawr case, would deny certiorari.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Source: CourtListener
