Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Elmer Banks v. Wainwright, 76 M (1963)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 76 M Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 21, 1963
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 375 U.S. 51 84 S. Ct. 152 11 L. Ed. 2d 108 Elmer BANKS v. WAINWRIGHT. No. 76, Misc. Supreme Court of the United States October 21, 1963 Elmer Banks, pro se. Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen. of Florida, and A. G. Spicola, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida. PER CURIAM. 1 The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the S
More

375 U.S. 51

84 S. Ct. 152

11 L. Ed. 2d 108

Elmer BANKS
v.
WAINWRIGHT.

No. 76, Misc.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 21, 1963

Elmer Banks, pro se.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen. of Florida, and A. G. Spicola, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida.

PER CURIAM.

1

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Florida for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S. Ct. 792, 9 L. Ed. 2d 799.

2

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS and Mr. Justice CLARK dissent for the reason that the judgment rests on an adequate state ground.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer