Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Doughty v. Maxwell, 422, Misc (1964)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 422, Misc Visitors: 45
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Feb. 24, 1964
Latest Update: Mar. 30, 2017
Summary: 376 U.S. 202 (1964) DOUGHTY v. MAXWELL, WARDEN. No. 422, Misc. Supreme Court of United States. Decided February 24, 1964. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Petitioner pro se. William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, and William C. Baird, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U.S. 506 , Gideon v
More
376 U.S. 202 (1964)

DOUGHTY
v.
MAXWELL, WARDEN.

No. 422, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided February 24, 1964.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.

Petitioner pro se.

William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, and William C. Baird, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U.S. 506, Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer