Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

McMann v. Ross, 153 (1969)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 153 Visitors: 15
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Dec. 08, 1969
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 396 U.S. 118 (1969) McMANN, WARDEN, ET AL. v. ROSS ET AL. No. 153. Supreme Court of United States. Decided December 8, 1969. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Lillian Z. Cohen and Brenda Soloff, Assistant Attorneys General, for petitioners. Thomas D. Barr for respondent Ross. Frank S. Hogan, pro se, and Michael R. Juviler for the District Attorney o
More
396 U.S. 118 (1969)

McMANN, WARDEN, ET AL.
v.
ROSS ET AL.

No. 153.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided December 8, 1969.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Lillian Z. Cohen and Brenda Soloff, Assistant Attorneys General, for petitioners.

Thomas D. Barr for respondent Ross.

Frank S. Hogan, pro se, and Michael R. Juviler for the District Attorney of New York County as amicus curiae urging reversal.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the suggestion of mootness by reason of the death of respondent Ross the judgment of the Court of Appeals, as to Ross, is vacated and the case as to him is remanded to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York with directions to dismiss the petition for writ of habeas corpus as moot.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer