Beacham v. Braterman, 404 (1969)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number: 404
Visitors: 36
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Oct. 20, 1969
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2020
Summary: 396 U.S. 12 (1969) BEACHAM v. BRATERMAN ET AL. No. 404. Supreme Court of United States. Decided October 20, 1969. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Bruce S. Rogow for appellant. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and T. T. Turnbull and James McGuirk, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should
Summary: 396 U.S. 12 (1969) BEACHAM v. BRATERMAN ET AL. No. 404. Supreme Court of United States. Decided October 20, 1969. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Bruce S. Rogow for appellant. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and T. T. Turnbull and James McGuirk, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should b..
More
396 U.S. 12 (1969)
BEACHAM
v.
BRATERMAN ET AL.
No. 404.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided October 20, 1969.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA.
Bruce S. Rogow for appellant.
Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and T. T. Turnbull and James McGuirk, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Source: CourtListener
