Balthazar v. Mari Ltd., 593 (1969)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number: 593
Visitors: 24
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Dec. 08, 1969
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2020
Summary: 396 U.S. 114 (1969) BALTHAZAR ET UX. v. MARI LTD. ET AL. No. 593. Supreme Court of United States. Decided December 8, 1969. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Marshall Patner for appellants. Maurice P. Raizes for Mari Ltd. et al., and Daniel P. Coman, Thomas E. Brannigan, and Dean H. Bilton for Boyle, appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdict
Summary: 396 U.S. 114 (1969) BALTHAZAR ET UX. v. MARI LTD. ET AL. No. 593. Supreme Court of United States. Decided December 8, 1969. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Marshall Patner for appellants. Maurice P. Raizes for Mari Ltd. et al., and Daniel P. Coman, Thomas E. Brannigan, and Dean H. Bilton for Boyle, appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdicti..
More
396 U.S. 114 (1969)
BALTHAZAR ET UX.
v.
MARI LTD. ET AL.
No. 593.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided December 8, 1969.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS.
Marshall Patner for appellants.
Maurice P. Raizes for Mari Ltd. et al., and Daniel P. Coman, Thomas E. Brannigan, and Dean H. Bilton for Boyle, appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Source: CourtListener
