Standard Fruit & Steamship Co. v. United Fruit Co., 740 (1969)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number: 740
Visitors: 80
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Jan. 20, 1969
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: 393 U.S. 406 (1969) STANDARD FRUIT & STEAMSHIP CO. v. UNITED FRUIT CO. ET AL. No. 740. Supreme Court of United States. Decided January 20, 1969. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Eberhard P. Deutsch, Robert M. Moore, and René H. Himel, Jr., for appellant. Hugh B. Cox and James H. McGlothlin for United Fruit Co., and Solicitor General Griswold for the United States, appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismis
Summary: 393 U.S. 406 (1969) STANDARD FRUIT & STEAMSHIP CO. v. UNITED FRUIT CO. ET AL. No. 740. Supreme Court of United States. Decided January 20, 1969. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Eberhard P. Deutsch, Robert M. Moore, and René H. Himel, Jr., for appellant. Hugh B. Cox and James H. McGlothlin for United Fruit Co., and Solicitor General Griswold for the United States, appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismiss..
More
393 U.S. 406 (1969)
STANDARD FRUIT & STEAMSHIP CO.
v.
UNITED FRUIT CO. ET AL.
No. 740.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided January 20, 1969.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA.
Eberhard P. Deutsch, Robert M. Moore, and René H. Himel, Jr., for appellant.
Hugh B. Cox and James H. McGlothlin for United Fruit Co., and Solicitor General Griswold for the United States, appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Shenandoah Valley Broadcasting, Inc. v. American Society of Composers, Authors & Publishers, 375 U.S. 39.
Source: CourtListener
