Serta Associates, Inc. v. United States, 878 (1969)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number: 878
Visitors: 13
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Feb. 25, 1969
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 393 U.S. 534 (1969) SERTA ASSOCIATES, INC. v. UNITED STATES. No. 878. Supreme Court of United States. Decided February 24, 1969. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Sigmund Timberg, Lionel G. Gross, and David V. Kahn for appellant. Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Hammond, and William R. Weissman for the United States. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. J
Summary: 393 U.S. 534 (1969) SERTA ASSOCIATES, INC. v. UNITED STATES. No. 878. Supreme Court of United States. Decided February 24, 1969. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Sigmund Timberg, Lionel G. Gross, and David V. Kahn for appellant. Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Hammond, and William R. Weissman for the United States. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JU..
More
393 U.S. 534 (1969)
SERTA ASSOCIATES, INC.
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 878.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided February 24, 1969.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS.
Sigmund Timberg, Lionel G. Gross, and David V. Kahn for appellant.
Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Hammond, and William R. Weissman for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.
MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Source: CourtListener
