Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Petterson v. Commissioner, Docket No. 35873 (1952)

Court: United States Tax Court Number: Docket No. 35873 Visitors: 18
Judges: Opper
Attorneys: Seymour Wells, C. P. A ., for the petitioners. R. G. Harless, Esq ., for the respondent.
Filed: Dec. 18, 1952
Latest Update: Dec. 05, 2020
P. C. and Ethel Petterson, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent
Petterson v. Commissioner
Docket No. 35873
United States Tax Court
December 18, 1952, Promulgated

1952 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 17">*17 Decision will be entered for the respondent.

Original deficiency in income tax liability held proper base for computing 50 per cent fraud penalty, despite later reduction in tax deficiency due to loss carry-back from subsequent year. Nick v. Dunlap (C. A. 5), 185 F.2d 674">185 F.2d 674, followed.

Seymour Wells, C. P. A., for the petitioners.
R. G. Harless, Esq., for the respondent.
Opper, Judge.

OPPER

19 T.C. 486">*486 OPINION.

A deficiency for 1947 in addition to tax on account of fraud in the amount of $ 4,475.32 is the sole controversy. There 19 T.C. 486">*487 is no question as to the existence of fraud and the sole issue is one of law. It is whether the amount of the 50 per cent fraud penalty is to be computed on the original deficiency or on the smaller sum admittedly reduced by a net loss carry-back from a subsequent year.

All of the facts have been stipulated and are hereby found accordingly. Petitioners' returns for 1947 and for 1949, the net-loss year, were filed with the collector for the district of Utah. The computations of the fraud penalty on the conflicting theories presented, as stipulated, are as follows:

Computation of Deficiency -- 1947
Before carrybackAfter carryback
lossloss
Net income$ 48,169.15$ 34,209.77
Less exemptions2,500.002,500.00
Income subject to normal tax and surtax$ 45,669.15$ 31,709.77
Tentative combined normal tax and surtax23,701.7914,280.06
Less 5 per cent reduction1,185.09714.00
Total income tax22,516.7013,566.06
Income tax liability per return2,076.712,076.71
Deficiency$ 20,439.99$ 11,489.35
50 per cent penalty -- Sec. 293 (b), I. R. C.$ 10,219.99$ 5,744.67

1952 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 17">*18 Although the question is novel in the Tax Court, the precise problem was disposed of in Nick v. Dunlap, an unreported opinion (June 22, 1950) of the District Court for the Northern District of Texas, 1950-5 C. C. H. para. 9436, 1950-4 P. H. para. 73236, which was affirmed (C. A. 5), , on authority of ; and certiorari was denied, . That decision held that the original deficiency, undiminished by the subsequent loss carry-back, was the proper base for computing the 50 per cent addition to tax for fraud. Petitioner does not attempt to distinguish the case. On its authority,

Decision will be entered for the respondent.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer