25 T.C. 1301">*1302 OPINION.

This proceeding involves a deficiency in estate tax in the amount of $ 7,075.60, determined by respondent under the provisions of the 1939 Code.

The sole issue is whether the Estate of Eleanor G. Plessen is entitled to a deduction for property previously taxed in a prior decedent's estate as provided in section 812 (c), ¹ measured by the full value of such property or whether such deduction is limited to such value minus the Federal estate taxes thereon, for which she was liable and which her executor paid.

1956 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 231">*233 The parties have stipulated that the petitioner will incur additional attorneys' fees and expenses incident to this proceeding which are to be allowed as an additional deduction to the estate and that the amount thereof may be given effect in a Rule 50 computation.

All of the facts were stipulated, are so found, and are incorporated herein by this reference.

Petitioner is the duly appointed and acting executor of the Estate of Eleanor G. Plessen, deceased. The estate tax return was filed with the former collector of internal revenue for the third district of New York.

25 T.C. 1301">*1303 Eleanor G. Plessen, who died on September 1, 1949, was the daughter of George A. Whiting. On March 23, 1931, Whiting transferred to himself and to Eleanor, as joint tenants with the right of survivorship, 3,800 shares of stock of Standard Wholesale Phosphate and Acid Works, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Standard). Whiting died testate on September 7, 1947, a resident of the State of Maryland. At the time of his death, stock dividends had increased the number of Standard shares to 4,009. Upon Whiting's death, such shares became the property of Eleanor.

Pursuant to the provisions of section 811 (e) of1956 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 231">*234 the 1939 Code, ² such shares were included in Whiting's gross estate for Federal estate tax purposes. The parties have agreed that the value of such shares at the time of Whiting's death was $ 168,378. Because Whiting's will did not provide against apportionment of his estate taxes, the portion of such taxes applicable to the Standard shares, and for which Eleanor was liable, was $ 51,482.49. Although Eleanor received the shares and subsequently exchanged them for other shares of stock, she had not paid her proportionate share of Whiting's estate taxes at the time of her death. The petitioner herein paid Eleanor's share of such taxes in the amount of $ 51,482.49 to the surviving executors of Whiting's estate on August 30, 1951.

1956 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 231">*235 In computing Eleanor's estate tax, the petitioner claimed a deduction for property previously taxed in the amount of the full value of the Standard shares. The respondent reduced the deduction for previously taxed property by $ 51,482.49, the proportionate share of Whiting's estate tax attributable to such stock, but excluded such sum in determining the value of Eleanor's net estate.

The petitioner concedes that Eleanor was liable for that portion of her father's estate tax attributable to the Standard shares and it, of course, argues that the shares qualify as previously taxed property within the meaning of section 812 (c). But it further argues, however, that the value of the property for purposes of that section is not to be reduced by estate taxes of Whiting's estate attributable to such shares, because the shares were actually an inter vivos gift made by Whiting in 1931, which ripened into full ownership by Eleanor when her father died in 1947.

25 T.C. 1301">*1304 We think that argument is without merit. Although the Standard shares may have been an inter vivos gift to Eleanor in 1931, she did not become the sole owner thereof until her father's death. The shares, as the parties agree, 1956 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 231">*236 were therefore properly includible in his gross estate under section 811 (e) because they constituted property "held as joint tenants by the decedent and" Eleanor. Since the shares were "property * * * forming a part of the gross estate * * * of * * * [a] person who died within five years prior to the death of" Eleanor, they qualify, as the parties further agree, as property previously taxed in valuing Eleanor's estate. And we can see no reason why the Standard shares which so qualify as previously taxed property under section 812 (c) should be valued any differently from any other property similarly qualifying for the deduction provided for in that section. Eleanor conceded her liability for her proportionate share of her father's estate taxes attributable to the Standard stock, and her executors subsequently satisfied that liability. Thus, the value of the property which she received from her father's estate was its net value after the estate taxes attributable thereto had been deducted. Estate of Roswell G. Ackley, 23 T.C. 639 (1955); Central Hanover B. & T. Co. v. Commissioner, 159 F.2d 167 (C. A. 2, 1947), 1956 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 231">*237 affirming 5 T.C. 1246 (1945), certiorari denied 331 U.S. 836">331 U.S. 836 (1947); Estate of Eugene L. Bender, 41 B. T. A. 80 (1940), affirmed sub nom. Bahr v. Commissioner, 119 F.2d 371 (C. A. 5, 1941), certiorari denied 314 U.S. 650">314 U.S. 650 (1941). In the Ackley case, we said that the deduction for previously taxed property is to be limited to so much of a prior decedent's net estate as might be identified in the estate of a subsequent decedent who died within 5 years; and that it matters not whether the estate taxes of the prior estate were paid with estate assets, from estate income or capital gains, or as here, by the second decedent or his estate, from his own funds. There is nothing in the instant case which distinguishes it from the cited cases or which warrants our taking it from under the rule announced therein. We think the respondent was correct in determining that the deduction for previously taxed property for Eleanor's estate was the agreed-upon value of the Standard shares less the $ 51,482.49 of Whiting's estate taxes attributable to1956 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 231">*238 such shares and paid by Eleanor's executor.

Decision will be entered under Rule 50.