1973 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 52">*52
Interest-free loans (or non-arm's-length loans at less than 5-percent interest) were made between brother-sister corporations.
60 T.C. 957">*958 OPINION
The Commissioner determined deficiencies1973 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 52">*53 in income tax as follows:
Docket No | Petitioner | TYE | Amount |
July, 31 -- | |||
1966 | $ 684.34 | ||
2135-72 | Fitzgerald Motor Co., Inc | 1967 | 722,46 |
1968 | 2,081.56 | ||
1966 | 1,039.54 | ||
2136-72 | Loans, Inc | 1967 | 1,046.15 |
1968 | 2,300.38 |
At issue is the propriety of the Commissioner's action under
Petitioner Fitzgerald Motor Co., Inc. (Fitzgerald) was a Georgia corporation engaged in the retail automobile business. Petitioner Loans, Inc. (Loans), also a Georgia corporation, was engaged in the business of providing financing on automobiles sold by Fitzgerald. Each petitioner's books and records were maintained on an accrual basis of accounting and their Federal corporate income tax returns were filed on a fiscal year ending July 31. Their respective tax returns for each of the taxable years ending July 31, 1966, and July 31, 1967, were filed with the district director of internal revenue at Atlanta, Ga., and their returns for the taxable year 1973 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 52">*54 ending July 31, 1968, were filed with the Southeast Service Center at Chamblee, Ga. At the time their petitions herein were filed, the principal office of both corporations was in Fitzgerald, Ga.
At all times relevant hereto, the sole stockholder of both Fitzgerald and Loans was one B. I. Anderson. Anderson also owned all of the stock of Dixie Peanut Co., Inc. (Dixie), a Georgia corporation operating as a wholesale dealer in peanuts and corn, and he served as president and chairman of the respective boards of directors of all three corporations. Dixie was an accrual basis taxpayer and filed Federal corporate income tax returns on a calendar year basis.
Prior to and during the tax period in issue, Fitzgerald made advances to Dixie, and Loans made advances to both Fitzgerald and Dixie. The table below sets forth the balances in the intercompany loan accounts as of July 31 of each year shown: 60 T.C. 957">*959
Owed to | Owed to Loans | Owed to Loans | |
Year | Fitzgerald by | by Fitzgerald | by Dixie |
Dixie | |||
1968 | $ 182,689.73 | $ 80,199.80 | 1 $ 21,805.86 |
1967 | 174,933.07 | 74,499.41 | |
1966 | 71,304.90 | ||
1965 | 169,521.16 | 62,935.89 | 21,805.86 |
1964 | 188,058.40 | 39,368.93 | 21,805.86 |
1963 | 181,843.31 | 46,975.91 | 21,805.86 |
1962 | 181,043.91 | 27,690.44 | 21,805.86 |
1961 | 175,923.70 | 28,693.01 | 16,000.00 |
1960 | 76,840.07 | 25,507.60 | 10,000.00 |
1959 | 67,829.92 | 30,565.40 | 10,000.00 |
1958 | 59,584.35 | 36,633.44 | 10,000.00 |
1957 | 52,380.82 | 13,900.45 | 10,000.00 |
1956 | 45,432.46 | 4,225.05 | |
1955 | 30,572.13 | 8,789.97 | |
1954 | 18,141.55 | 27,499.99 | |
1953 | 3,655.98 | 21,279.65 | |
1952 | 991.06 | 1,472.78 | |
1951 | 8,782.91 |
No notes or loan agreements were made in respect of the advances shown in the foregoing table. The stipulated materials fail to establish the rates or amounts of interest, if any, called for, or in fact paid, upon the indebtedness, nor does the record disclose the purposes for which the loans were made or the uses to which the proceeds were put by the borrowers.
Both Fitzgerald and Loans were operated at a profit in each of the taxable years in issue, but Dixie sustained a net operating loss in each of the years 1966-68. Dixie's corporate charter provided that the corporate objective was "pecuniary benefit to the shareholders." The following table represents a summary of data contained in the income tax returns of Fitzgerald, Loans, and Dixie:
Fitzgerald -- TYE July 31 -- | |||
1966 | 1967 | 1968 | |
Gross receipts | $ 477,816 | $ 552,485 | $ 508,652 |
Cost of goods | |||
sold | (400,357) | (477,751) | (433,693) |
Gross profit | 77,459 | 74,734 | 74,959 |
Finance charges | 3,534 | 6,033 | 4,666 |
Other interest | 5,027 | 6,086 | 5,597 |
Miscellaneous | |||
income | 2,423 | 2,821 | 2,739 |
Total | |||
income | 88,443 | 89,674 | 87,961 |
Interest expense | (4,920) | (6,528) | (4,279) |
Net operating | |||
loss deduction | |||
Other deductions | (71,576) | (73,170) | (67,054) |
Taxable | |||
income | 11,947 | 9,976 | 16,628 |
Loans -- TYE | |||
July 31 -- | |||
1966 | 1967 | 1968 | |
Gross receipts | |||
Cost of goods | |||
sold | |||
Gross profit | |||
Finance charges | $ 8,462 | $ 8,528 | $ 8,621 |
Other interest | |||
Miscellaneous | |||
income | 262 | 32 | |
Total | |||
income | 8,724 | 8,560 | 8,621 |
Interest expense | |||
Net operating | |||
loss deduction | |||
Other deductions | (4,535) | (5,834) | (3,403) |
Taxable | |||
income | 4,189 | 2,726 | 5,218 |
Dixie -- TYE Dec. 31 -- | |||
1966 | 1967 | 1968 | |
Gross receipts | $ 1,408,465 | $ 930,521 | $ 1,119,090 |
Cost of goods | |||
sold | (1,229,203) | (812,663) | (1,049,769) |
Gross profit | 179,262 | 117,858 | 69,321 |
Finance charges | |||
Other interest | |||
Miscellaneous | |||
income | 923 | 523 | 234 |
Total | |||
income | 180,185 | 118,381 | 69,555 |
Interest expense | (47,267) | (40,231) | (46,520) |
Net operating | |||
loss deduction | (2,629) | (44,850) | (95,532) |
Other deductions | (175,139) | (128,832) | (129,148) |
Taxable | |||
income | (44,850) | (95,532) | (201,645) |
The following table represents a summary of the data contained in each corporation's yearend balance sheets: 60 T.C. 957">*960
Fitzgerald -- balances as of July 31 -- | ||||
1965 | 1966 | 1967 | 1968 | |
Assets: | ||||
Cash | $ 150,921 | $ 169,449 | $ 145,535 | $ 158,032 |
Notes and accounts receivable | 66,647 | 73,012 | 79,281 | 87,784 |
Inventories | 118,831 | 155,608 | 117,581 | 163,470 |
Prepaid expenses | 907 | |||
Buildings and fixed depreciable | ||||
assets (less accumulated depre- | ||||
ciation) | 5,456 | 5,612 | 4,275 | 3,697 |
Land | ||||
Other investments | ||||
Amounts due from affiliates | 179,693 | 180,214 | 198,431 | 194,876 |
Amounts due from stockholder | ||||
Total assets | 522,455 | 583,895 | 545,103 | 607,859 |
Liabilities and capital: | ||||
Accounts payable | 9,761 | 6,487 | 5,381 | 6,868 |
Amounts due to affiliates | 76,477 | 87,665 | 90,812 | 96,282 |
Amounts due to stockholder | 25,211 | 25,320 | 21,053 | 14,640 |
Other current liabilities | 189,363 | 233,383 | 189,035 | 238,487 |
Capital stock | 50,000 | 50,000 | 50,000 | 50,000 |
Earned surplus | 171,643 | 181,040 | 188,822 | 201,582 |
Total liabilities and capital | 522,455 | 583,895 | 545,103 | 607,859 |
Loans -- balances as of July 31 -- | ||||
1965 | 1966 | 1967 | 1968 | |
Assets: | ||||
Cash | $ 7,098 | $ 7,100 | $ 6,163 | $ 72 |
Notes and accounts receivable | 60,731 | 52,093 | 50,454 | 46,386 |
Inventories | ||||
Prepaid expenses | ||||
Buildings and fixed depreciable | ||||
assets (less accumulated depre- | ||||
ciation) | ||||
Land | ||||
Other investments | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 |
Amounts due from affiliates | 90,633 | 101,129 | 105,445 | 111,739 |
Amounts due from stockholder | 1,026 | 1,026 | 1 1,026 | 1,125 |
Total assets | 162,488 | 164,348 | 166,088 | 162,322 |
Liabilities and capital: | ||||
Accounts payable | 632 | 516 | 597 | 484 |
Amounts due to affiliates | 369 | 369 | 369 | 369 |
Amounts due to stockholder | ||||
Other current liabilities | 11,028 | 9,738 | 9,270 | 1,489 |
Capital stock | 25,000 | 25,000 | 25,000 | 25,000 |
Earned surplus | 125,459 | 128,725 | 130,852 | 134,980 |
Total liabilities and capital | 162,488 | 164,348 | 166,088 | 162,322 |
Dixie -- balances as of Dec. 31 -- | ||||
1965 | 1966 | 1967 | 1968 | |
Assets: | ||||
Cash | $ 361,138 | $ 319,909 | $ 330,746 | $ 349,549 |
Notes and accounts receivable | 964 | 1,081 | 6,516 | 1,110 |
Inventories | 1,573,474 | 1,165,977 | 1,442,682 | 1,184,611 |
Prepaid expenses | 3,500 | 3,500 | 3,500 | 3,500 |
Buildings and fixed depreciable | ||||
assets (less accumulated depre- | ||||
ciation) | 84,461 | 117,250 | 137,471 | 175,738 |
Land | 750 | 750 | 750 | 750 |
Other investments | ||||
Amounts due from affiliates | 17,238 | 19,517 | 45,678 | |
Amounts due from stockholder | ||||
Total assets | 2,041,525 | 1,627,984 | 1,967,343 | 1,715,258 |
Liabilities and capital: | ||||
Accounts payable | 5,127 | 16,712 | 15,324 | 34,090 |
Amounts due to affiliates | 226,375 | 231,502 | 252,118 | 291,690 |
Amounts due to stockholder | 395,812 | 406,931 | 418,547 | 450,546 |
Other current liabilities | 1,260,263 | 861,112 | 1,220,309 | 984,000 |
Capital stock | 100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 |
Earned surplus | 53,948 | 11,727 | (38,955) | (145,068) |
Total liabilities and capital | 2,041,525 | 1,627,984 | 1,967,343 | 1,715,258 |
60 T.C. 957">*961 In his separate deficiency notices to Fitzgerald and Loans, the Commissioner determined:
that interest income reported on your return for each year involved herein is understated by the amount shown below, which amount constitutes the arm's length interest that should have been charged by you on monies advanced by you to * * * corporations owned or controlled by the same interests. Under the authority of
The additional interest income referred to above was computed by the Commissioner in the respective deficiency notices as shown in the following tables: 1
Fitzgerald -- TYE July 31 -- | |||
1966 | 1967 | 1968 | |
Average monthly balance of advances | |||
made by Fitzgerald to | |||
Dixie | $ 169,713.00 | $ 173,178.00 | $ 180,070.00 |
Appropriate interest rate | 5% | 5% | 5% |
Interest income earned by Fitzgerald | |||
as corrected | $ 8,485.64 | $ 8,658.90 | $ 9,003.58 |
Amount reported | $ 5,375.00 | $ 5,375.00 | $ 3,875.00 |
Additional interest income earned by | |||
Fitzgerald on advances | |||
to Dixie | $ 3,110.64 | $ 3,283.90 | $ 5,128.58 |
Loans -- TYE July 31 -- | |||
1966 | 1967 | 1968 | |
Average monthly balances of advances | |||
made by Loans to: | |||
Fitzgerald | $ 72,693.00 | $ 73,293.00 | $ 77,243.00 |
Dixie | $ 21,806.00 | $ 21,806.00 | $ 21,806.00 |
Appropriate interest rate | 5% | 5% | 5% |
Additional interest income earned by | |||
Loans on advances to: | |||
Fitzgerald | 1 $ 3,634.87 | $ 3,664.96 | $ 3,862.44 |
Dixie | $ 1,090.29 | $ 1,090.29 | $ 1,090.29 |
1973 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 52">*60 In his deficiency notice to Fitzgerald the Commissioner informed Fitzgerald that it would be entitled to correlative adjustments (deductions) for each of its taxable years ending July 31, 1966-68, if it were finally determined that the income of Loans should be increased for each such taxable year by reason of the advances from Loans to Fitzgerald. The Commissioner advised Fitzgerald to file an appropriate claim, and Fitzgerald has accordingly filed a protective claim for refund (Treasury Form 843) for each of the taxable years.
Petitioners' principal argument is that the imputation of interest income to them to reflect arm's-length charges on the advances they 60 T.C. 957">*962 made to their affiliates was beyond the scope of the Commissioner's power under
1973 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 52">*61 With the recent decision of the Court of Appeals in
It is thus clear under our recent decisions that gross income earned by a debtor corporation may be allocated to the creditor, in accordance with a determination by the Commissioner, to the extent that the creditor fails to establish that such income was not earned with the proceeds of funds lent at less than an arm's-length rate. Moreover, so long as the Commissioner proceeds under the theory that gross income is to be allocated -- rather than under the theory that interest income may be imputed "without regard to whether the * * * borrowed funds produced income," cf.
In the case now before us, the Commissioner has advanced alternative theories in support of his determinations. He has renewed his argument that he is empowered by
We reject petitioners' argument that at most only a comparatively minimal amount of gross income earned by the debtor corporations during the taxable years is traceable to advances made during those years, that the major portions of the receivable balances for the years in issue were created by loans made in prior years, and that, relying upon
1. The original stipulation of facts submitted by the parties shows the balance in the Fitzgerald-Dixie account as of July 31, 1966, to be $ 169,521.16 and the balances in the Loans-Dixie account as of July 31, 1966-68, to be $ 21,806. A supplemental stipulation filed by the parties, without purporting to supersede the original stipulation, shows such balances in the amounts appearing in the above table.↩
1. The amounts shown are taken from a statement accompanying the income tax return for the taxable year ending in 1967. The comparable statement accompanying the return for the year ending in 1968 shows amounts "due from affiliates" and "due from stockholder" as of July 31, 1967, to be $ 105,346 and $ 1,125, respectively.↩
1. The Commissioner has conceded, without explanation, that a mathematical error resulting in an overstatement of the additional tax due was made in computing the adjustment in respect of the advances made by Loans to Fitzgerald during the first 5 months of the taxable year ending July 31, 1966. Of the total adjustment in Loans' income for that year relating to advances to Fitzgerald ($ 3,634.87), the amount of $ 2,196.48 (attributable solely to advances made during the last 7 months of the taxable year ending July 31, 1966) remains in dispute.↩
1. The underlying basis for the amounts shown in the two tables does not appear in the record; however, petitioners do not dispute the figures thus used by the Commissioner.↩
2.
In any case of two or more organizations, trades, or businesses (whether or not incorporated, whether or not organized in the United States, and whether or not affiliated) owned or controlled directly or indirectly by the same interests, the Secretary or his delegate may distribute, apportion, or allocate gross income, deductions, credits, or allowances between or among such organizations, trades, or businesses, if he determines that such distribution, apportionment, or allocation is necessary in order to prevent evasion of taxes or clearly to reflect the income of any of such organizations, trades, or businesses.↩
3. This issue was not considered by the Tax Court in
4. The Commissioner explained his acquiescence in