65 T.C. 620">*620 Respondent determined the following deficiencies in petitioner's Federal income tax:

The issues for decision are: (1) Whether petitioner, an organization exempt from Federal income taxation pursuant to section 501(c)(4), ¹ was engaged in an "unrelated trade or business" within the meaning of that term as defined in section 513; and, if so, (2) whether income resulting from such a trade or business is subject to tax under section 511.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Petitioner is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota and, at the date this petition was filed, its principal place of business was St. Paul, Minn. Prior to the years in issue, petitioner had obtained a letter of determination from the Internal Revenue1975 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 8">*12 Service granting it an exemption from Federal income taxation under section 501(c)(4). ² Accordingly, petitioner for each of the taxable years ended January 31, 1971 65 T.C. 620">*621 through 1973, filed with the Internal Revenue Service a "Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax" (Form 990), showing no taxable income.

During each of the years in issue, petitioner operated profitable bingo games which were open to the general public. The following1975 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 8">*13 is a summary of the gross receipts, related expenses, and net profits of petitioner's bingo operation:

The bingo games were held approximately 52 times each year, usually each Thursday evening from 8 p.m. to 12 midnight, at a Veterans of Foreign Wars hall located in St. Paul, which was rented by petitioner for the purpose of holding the games. The operation of bingo games in Minnesota was regulated pursuant to the State statutes and local ordinances, and petitioner applied for and was issued the requisite authorization.

On the night bingo was conducted, petitioner required the services of 7 to 10 individuals to manage the operation. Such individuals would distribute the bingo cards, collect money from the participants, check the number of cards being used, notify the caller when a winning card was claimed, and take turns calling the bingo numbers. Each worker was paid $ 8 for 4 hours of work, and from this amount petitioner withheld Social Security, State, and Federal taxes. ³

1975 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 8">*14 For the taxable years 1971, 1972, and 1973, petitioner did not report any taxable income from the operation of the bingo games, relying upon its exemption ruling. In the notice of deficiency, however, respondent determined that the bingo games held weekly by petitioner constituted an "unrelated trade or business" under section 513 and that the income received therefrom was subject to tax under section 511.

OPINION

Section 511(a)⁴1975 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 8">*15 imposes a tax on income received by exempt 65 T.C. 620">*622 organizations which is derived from unrelated trade or business activities. Section 513(a)⁵ defines the term "unrelated trade or business" generally to include any trade or business carried on by an exempt organization, the conduct of which, aside from the organization's need to raise funds, is not substantially related to the exempt purposes of the organization. In the instant case, the evidence is clear that petitioner's regularly conducted bingo games were a trade or business from which it derived considerable income and that the bingo games were not substantially related to petitioner's exempt functions. We think it quite clear that petitioner is subject to the tax on its bingo income.

Petitioner maintains, however, that the operation of its bingo games is not a trade or business and, alternatively, that petitioner's operations fall within the exception in section 513(a)(1) for any trade or1975 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 8">*16 business in which substantially all the work is performed without compensation.

Petitioner's first contention, as we understand it, begins with the premise that the Minnesota statutes and certain ordinances of the City of St. Paul describe bingo as a game, not a business, and restrict its operations to charitable organizations. Petitioner then points out that the legislative history of the original enactment of the unrelated business tax shows that the tax was directed toward the unfair competition problems flowing from 65 T.C. 620">*623 the conduct of business activities by exempt organizations engaged in commercial or mercantile activities. See H. Rept. No. 2319, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. (1950), 1950-2 C.B. 380, 408; S. Rept. No. 2375, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. (1950), 1950-2 C.B. 483, 503. From these premises petitioner argues that its bingo operations were not a trade or business within the meaning of section 511, citing Greene County Medical Society Found. v. United States, 345 F. Supp. 900 (W.D. Mo. 1972), affd. by unpublished order (8th Cir. 1973), where the court held that income from the cutting and sale1975 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 8">*17 of phonograph records as novelties or souvenirs was not unrelated business income of a local medical society.

The applicability of the unrelated business tax depends upon the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code rather than Minnesota State law. ⁶Section 1.513-1(a), Income Tax Regs., interprets section 513(a), quoted in footnote 5 supra, apart from the specific exceptions, to include the gross income of an exempt organization subject to the section 511 tax in the computation of unrelated business income if: (1) It is income from a trade or business; (2) such trade or business is regularly carried on by the organization; and (3) the conduct of such trade or business is not substantially related (other than through the production of funds) to the organization's performance of its exempt functions.

1975 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 8">*18 None of the specific exceptions in section 513 applies to petitioner, ⁷ and its income meets all three of these tests. The operation of bingo games for the production of income is a trade or business. Cf. Help The Children, Inc., 28 T.C. 1128">28 T.C. 1128 (1957); Porter v. Commissioner, 437 F.2d 39">437 F.2d 39, 437 F.2d 39">40 (2d Cir. 1970), affg. a Memorandum Opinion of this Court; Hirsch v. Commissioner, 315 F.2d 731">315 F.2d 731, 315 F.2d 731">736 (9th Cir. 1963), affg. a Memorandum Opinion of this Court; see also sec. 513(c); ⁸sec. 1.513-1(b), Income Tax 65 T.C. 620">*624 Regs. Petitioner's once-a-week activities clearly meet the regularly-carried-on test contained in section 1.513-1(c)(2)(i), Income Tax Regs. Finally, other than the raising of money for its civic and charitable purposes, petitioner's bingo operations had no substantial relationship to its exempt purposes. See sec. 1.513-1(d)(2), Income Tax Regs.

1975 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 8">*19 The Greene County Medical Society Found. case involved the years 1964, 1965, and 1966, prior to the effective date of the extensive amendments of the unrelated business tax provisions included in the Tax Reform Act of 1969 and, for this reason, provides little help in deciding the instant case. It is true that the court in that case emphasized the absence of any unfair competition flowing from that exempt organization's activities. However, unfair competition plays a relatively insignificant role in the application of the amended unrelated business tax, as shown by the following provisions of section 1.513-1(b), Income Tax Regs.:

In general, any activity of a section 511 organization which is carried on for the production of income and which otherwise possesses the characteristics required to constitute "trade or business" within the meaning of section 162 -- and which, in addition, is not substantially related to the performance of exempt functions -- presents sufficient likelihood of unfair competition to be within the policy of the tax. * * *

Also lacking in merit is petitioner's argument that its case falls within the exception to the definition of unrelated trade or business1975 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 8">*20 contained in section 513(a)(1), i.e., a business in which substantially all the work in carrying it on is performed for the organization without compensation. Although the 7 to 10 individuals who handled the bingo operations were each paid $ 8 for 4 hours of work each week, petitioner maintains that this payment was designed merely to reimburse the workers for the commuting, meals, and laundry expenses they incurred in doing the work. On this theory, petitioner maintains that the payments were not compensation.

We do not agree. In the tax laws, the term "compensation" is a broad concept. See, e.g., Commissioner v. LoBue, 351 U.S. 243">351 U.S. 243, 351 U.S. 243">246 (1956); Commissioner v. Smith, 324 U.S. 177">324 U.S. 177, 324 U.S. 177">181 (1945). The regulations interpreting this exception in section 513(a)(1)65 T.C. 620">*625 give an example of "an exempt orphanage operating a retail store and selling to the general public, where substantially all the work in carrying on such business is performed for the organization by volunteers without compensation." Sec. 1.513-1(e), Income Tax Regs. Clearly, petitioner's bingo operators were not volunteers. Nor were the payments they1975 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 8">*21 received in any way correlated with their expenses. All of the workers were paid at the rate of $ 2 per hour regardless of the cost of any commuting, meals, or laundry which they could attribute to the bingo work. Indeed, petitioner's withholding of Social Security and State and Federal income taxes from such amounts demonstrates that it regarded them as compensation to its employees at the time the services were performed. ⁹ We do not think petitioner's bingo operators worked without compensation.

As we view the evidence, the express provisions of sections 511 and 512 compel the conclusion that petitioner is subject to the unrelated business tax on its income from its bingo operations during the years1975 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 8">*22 in controversy. To reflect the foregoing,

Decision will be entered for the respondent.