Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Find Similar Cases by Filters
You can browse Case Laws by Courts, or by your need.
Find 49 similar cases
CROWN EUROCARS, INC. vs MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, 12-003381 (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Tallahassee, Florida Oct. 15, 2012 Number: 12-003381 Latest Update: Dec. 10, 2012

Conclusions This matter came before the Department for entry of a Final Order upon submission of an Order Closing File and Relinquishing Jurisdiction by William F. Quattlebaum, Administrative Law Judge of the Division of Administrative Hearings, pursuant to Petitioner’s Notice Of Dismissal, a copy of which is attached and incorporated by reference in this order. The Department hereby adopts the Order Closing File and Relinquishing Jurisdiction as its Final Order in this matter. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this case is CLOSED. Filed December 10, 2012 1:21 PM Division of Administrative Hearings DONE AND ORDERED this | day of December, 2012, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. ‘uréau of Issuance Oversight Division of Motorist Services Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Neil Kirkman Building, Room A338 Tallahassee, Florida 32399 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Motorist Services this | day of December, 2012. NOTICE OF APPEAL RIGHTS Judicial review of this order may be had pursuant to section 120.68, Florida Statutes, in the District Court of Appeal for the First District, State of Florida, or in any other district court of appeal of this state in an appellate district where a party resides. In order to initiate such review, one copy of the notice of appeal must be filed with the Department and the other copy of the notice of appeal, together with the filing fee, must be filed with the court within thirty days of the filing date of this order as set out above, pursuant to Rules of Appellate Procedure. JB/jdc Copies furnished: J. Andrew Bertron, Esquire Nelson, Mullins, Riley, and Scarborough, LLP 3600 Maclay Boulevard South, Suite 202 Tallahassee, Florida 32312 Andy.bertron@nelsonmullins.com Nicholas A. Bader, Esquire Bass Sox Mercer, P.A. 2822 Remington Green Circle Tallahassee, Florida 32308 nbader@dealerlawyer.com William F. Quattlebaum Administrative Law Judge Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building 1230 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550 Nalini Vinayak Dealer License Administrator

# 1
CHRYSLER GROUP CARCO, LLC AND FIRST COAST CJDR, LLC vs TT OF JACKSONVILLE, INC., D/B/A JACKSONVILLE CHRYSLER JEEP DODGE, 10-002562 (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Tallahassee, Florida May 13, 2010 Number: 10-002562 Latest Update: Jul. 28, 2010

Conclusions This matter came before the Department for entry of a Final Order upon submission of an Order Relinquishing Jurisdiction and Closing File by James H. Peterson, III, Administrative Law Judge of the Division of Administrative Hearings, pursuant to Petitioner’s Notice of Withdrawal of Intent to Establish Dealership, a copy of which is attached and incorporated by reference in this order. The Department hereby adopts the Order Closing File as its Final Order in this matter. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this case is CLOSED and no license will be issued to Chrysler Group Carco LLC and First Coast CIDR LLC to sell automobiles of the line-make Jeep (JEEP) or Chrysler (CHRY) at 10979 Atlantic Boulevard, Jacksonville (Duval County), Florida 32225. Filed July 28, 2010 2:16 PM Division of Administrative Hearings. DONE AND ORDERED this 2/ day of July 2010, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. L A. FORD, Directo: Division of Motor Vehicles Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Neil Kirkman Building Tallahassee, Florida 32399 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Motor Vehicles this Hh day of July 2010. abe vinta Lionel. ‘Administrator NOTICE OF APPEAL RIGHTS Judicial review of this order may be had pursuant to section 120.68, Florida Statutes, in the District Court of Appeal for the First District, State of Florida, or in any other district court of appeal of this state in an appellate district where a party resides. In order to initiate such review, one copy of the notice of appeal must be filed with the Department and the other copy of the notice of appeal, together with the filing fee, must be filed with the court within thirty days of the filing date of this order as set out above, pursuant to Rules of Appellate Procedure. CAF/vlg Copies furnished: C. Everett Boyd, Esquire Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP 3600 Maclay Boulevard South, Suite 202 Tallahassee, Florida 32312 Benjamin C. Moore, Esquire St. Denis & Davey, P. A. 1300 Riverplace Boulevard, Suite 101 Jacksonville, Florida 32207 James H. Peterson, III Administrative Law Judge Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building 1230 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550 Nalini Vinayak Dealer License Administrator

# 2
VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC. vs REEVES IMPORT MOTORCARS, INC., 12-002853 (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Tallahassee, Florida Aug. 24, 2012 Number: 12-002853 Latest Update: Nov. 26, 2013

Conclusions This matter came before the Department for entry of a Final Order upon submission of a Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice along with an Order Closing File and Relinquishing Jurisdiction by Linzie F. Bogan an Administrative Law Judge of the Division of Administrative Hearings, copies of which are attached and incorporated by reference in this order. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. DONE AND ORDERED this aia day of November, 2013, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. Bureau of Issuance Oversight Division of Motorist Services Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Neil Kirkman Building, Room A338 Tallahassee, Florida 32399 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Motorist Services this Be ay of November, 2013. Nalini Vinayak, Dealer Kicense Administrator Filed November 26, 2013 3:54 PM Division of Administrative Hearings NOTICE OF APPEAL RIGHTS Judicial review of this order may be had pursuant to section 120.68, Florida Statutes, in the District Court of Appeal for the First District, State of Florida, or in any other district court of appeal of this state in an appellate district where a party resides. In order to initiate such review, one copy of the notice of appeal must be filed with the Department and the other copy of the notice of appeal, together with the filing fee, must be filed with the court within thirty days of the filing date of this order as set out above, pursuant to Rules of Appellate Procedure. Copies furnished: Richard N. Sox, Esquire Bass Sox Mercer, P.A. 2822 Remington Green Circle Tallahassee, Florida 32308 Randall L. Oyler, Esqurie Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg, LLP 200 West Madison Street, Suite 3900 Chicago, Illinois 60606 Linzie F. Bogan Administrative Law Judge Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building 1230 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550 Nalini Vinayak Dealer License Administrator acy. ae

# 3
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES vs PLANET POWERSPORTS CORP., 12-001678 (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Miami, Florida May 14, 2012 Number: 12-001678 Latest Update: Jul. 26, 2012

Conclusions This matter came before the Department for entry of a Final Order upon the Settlement Stipulation and submission of an Order Closing File and Relinquishing Jurisdiction by Errol H. Powell, an Administrative Law Judge of the Division of Administrative Hearings, copies of which are attached and incorporated by reference in this order. The Department hereby adopts the Settlement Stipulation and Order Closing File as its Final Order in this matter. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall carry out the terms of the Settlement Stipulation. DONE AND ORDERED this Ake day of July, 2012, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. ; \ Boker, Chief Bureau of Issuance Oversight Division of Motorist Services Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Neil Kirkman Building, Room A338 Tallahassee, Florida 32399 Filed in the official records of the Division of Motorist Services this lo ( fa) day of July, 2012. bin Vrnarzoke Nalini Vinayak, Dealer Kicense Administrator Filed July 26, 2012 3:32 PM Division of Administrative Hearings NOTICE OF APPEAL RIGHTS Judicial review of this order may be had pursuant to section 120.68, Florida Statutes, in the District Court of Appeal for the First District, State of Florida, or in any other district court of appeal of this state in an appellate district where a party resides. In order to initiate such review, one copy of the notice of appeal must be filed with the Department and the other copy of the notice of appeal, together with the filing fee, must be filed with the court within thirty days of the filing date of this order as set out above, pursuant to Rules of Appellate Procedure. Copies furnished: R. Craig Spickard, Esquire Kurkin Forehand Brandes, LLP 800 N. Calhoun Street, Suite 1B Tallahassee, Florida 32303 James K. Fisher, Esquire Department of Highway Safety And Motor Vehicles Neil Kirkman Building, Room A430 2900 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0500 Errol H. Powell Administrative Law Judge Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building 1230 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550 Nalini Vinayak Dealer License Administrator

# 4
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES vs ROBERT E. POINDEXTER, 99-005314 (1999)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Viera, Florida Dec. 17, 1999 Number: 99-005314 Latest Update: Aug. 14, 2000

The Issue The issue in this case is whether Petitioner should deny Respondent's application for a yacht salesperson's license on the ground that Respondent failed to furnish proof of his good moral character in violation of Section 326.004(6)(a), Florida Statutes (1999). (All chapter and section references are to Florida Statutes (1999) unless otherwise stated.)

Findings Of Fact Petitioner is the state agency responsible for regulating yacht and ship salespeople and brokers and for administering and enforcing Chapter 326. Respondent is a licensee applying for renewal of a yacht salesperson's license. Respondent applied for and the Division approved Respondent's initial yacht salesperson's license in 1995. Pursuant to Section 326.004(1), yacht salesperson's licenses are valid for a two-year period. In addition, Respondent formerly held a state contractor's license and a real estate broker's license from Petitioner's agency. The Construction Industry Licensing Board ("CILB") is a division of Petitioner. The CILB served Respondent with an administrative complaint regarding his contractor's license in March 1997. In 1998, the Florida Real Estate Commission ("FREC") revoked Petitioner's real estate license. The Division did not become aware of the administrative proceedings against Respondent's construction and real estate licenses until August 1998. By final order issued March 19, 1998, the CILB fined Respondent and suspended his state contractor's license for five years. The CILB found that Respondent violated Section 489.129(1)(h)(2), (k) and (m). Respondent committed mismanagement that caused financial harm to a customer by accepting deposit money but failing to perform on the contract; abandoned the construction project under contract by failing to begin construction for a period of five months; and engaged in deceitful conduct in the practice of contracting. The CILB also found that Respondent violated Section 489.129(1)(n) by committing incompetence and misconduct in the practice of contracting. The victims in Respondent's CILB case received $22,845.00 from the Construction Industries Recovery Fund as compensation for the harm they suffered due to Respondent's violation of Section 489.129(1)(h)(2). Respondent's obligation to pay restitution to the victims was discharged in bankruptcy. Respondent is still paying the fines and interest ordered in the CILB license suspension case involving his construction license. After the CILB suspended Respondent's contractor's license, FREC, another division of Petitioner, issued an administrative complaint seeking to revoke Respondent's real estate broker's license on the ground that the CILB had suspended Respondent's construction license. Respondent voluntarily surrendered his real estate broker's license for revocation. By final order dated August 19, 1998, FREC revoked Respondent's real estate broker's license. Respondent timely applied for, and the Division approved, the renewal of Respondent's yacht salesperson's license in August 1997. On this renewal application, Respondent answered "N" to question number four which asked whether there were any cases pending against the applicant. In August 1999, Respondent timely applied for renewal of his yacht salesperson's license. Petitioner denied the application on the sole ground that Respondent failed to show that he is of good moral character in violation of Section 326.004(6)(a). Petitioner determined that Respondent failed to show good moral character based on the CILB suspension of Respondent's contractor's license, FREC's revocation of Respondent's real estate license, and Petitioner's conclusion that Respondent had answered question four on his 1997 renewal application untruthfully in violation of Section 326.006(2)(f)1. Petitioner relied solely on a review of the documents in its file and did not conduct an independent investigation or interview Respondent. Respondent did not falsely answer "no" to question four on his 1997 renewal application. Question four asked, in relevant part: Has any judgment or decree of court been entered against you or is there now pending any case, in this or any other state, in which you were charged with any fraudulent or dishonest dealing. Question four limited its scope to judgments, decrees, and cases pending in any court in this or another state and did not ask for disclosure of administrative proceedings. Administrative agencies, including DOAH, are not courts. The administrative complaint filed against Respondent in March 1997 was not a case pending in a court in this or another state. As Petitioner noted on its Investigative Report, ". . . a final order of an agency is not a judgment or decree of court." Respondent construed question four on his 1997 renewal application to be limited to courts. Respondent's interpretation was reasonable and valid. It was not intended to deceive Petitioner. In August 1998, an attorney for FREC informed Respondent that he should disclose administrative proceedings in addition to court cases. Respondent immediately informed Petitioner by telephone and letter of the pending administrative proceedings. In the renewal application filed in 1999, Respondent disclosed the suspension of his construction license, the revocation of his real estate license, and answered "yes" to question four on the application. In an effort toward full disclosure, Respondent answered "yes" to question three when Respondent should have answered "no." Question three asked Respondent if he had been convicted of a crime. The only finding from the suspension of Respondent's construction license by the CILB and the revocation of Respondent's real estate license by FREC that is at issue in this case is a finding by ALJ Daniel M. Kilbride that Respondent committed fraud and deceit by adding a provision for a commission at the end of a construction contract entered into on December 23, 1994. By final order entered on March 16, 1998, the CILB adopted the Recommended Order of Judge Kilbride. The judicial doctrine of equitable estoppel, or estoppel by judgment, bars the re-litigation of factual and legal issues common to both the CILB case and this case. Therefore, the finding that Respondent committed fraud and deceit in 1994 cannot be litigated in this case. The good moral character of Respondent was not at issue in the license suspension case decided by Judge Kilbride. Therefore, Respondent is entitled to present evidence of his good moral character in this case including evidence that explains and mitigates the circumstances of the 1994 transaction in an effort to show that Respondent does not now lack good moral character. The sales commission at issue in the 1994 transaction was to be paid out of Respondent's proceeds from the construction contract. It was not an additional expense to be paid by the buyers. It did not increase the construction price of the house. The commission was to be paid by Respondent for services provided by Castle Real Estate on behalf of Respondent. The buyers did not object to the insertion of the commission provision at the end of the contract. The buyers did not object to the commission being paid at closing. The construction lender released the funds for the commission as part of the construction draw Respondent received. The funds were not separately identified, and Respondent had no knowledge that the lender had released the funds as part of the construction draw. Respondent was an active builder in the local real estate market. He had constructed several "spec" homes. When the real estate market declined, Respondent incurred financial problems attributable to subcontractors and was unable to service the debt he owed on the "spec" homes. Respondent declared bankruptcy in 1996. The buyers in the 1994 transaction did not make any request for refund until after Respondent had declared bankruptcy. Respondent could not make preferential payments to creditors after he declared bankruptcy. More than five years have passed since the 1994 transaction. Even if Respondent lacked good moral character in 1994, he now possesses good moral character. Respondent is now in stable financial condition. Respondent has made all payments due under the license suspension order in a timely manner. Respondent is a licensed captain in the Coast Guard Auxiliary. He has served as a commodore of the local boating club and as a former public affairs officer in charge of public education for the local flotilla. Respondent has conducted himself with integrity in all of his yacht sales. Respondent enjoys an excellent reputation in the boating community for honesty and integrity. Respondent's knowledge about yachts is above average. Over a span of 15 years, Respondent has held licenses with the state as a mortgage broker, real estate salesman, and real estate broker. During that time, no complaints have ever been filed against Respondent for his activities under those licenses. The revocation of Respondent's real estate license was based on the suspension of Respondent's construction license by the CILB. The complaint filed against Respondent's construction license involved a single isolated transaction that occurred more than five years ago for which there were significant mitigating circumstances.

Recommendation Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is RECOMMENDED that Petitioner enter a final order finding that Respondent has good moral character, within the meaning of Section 326.004(6)(a), and renewing Respondent's yacht salesperson's license. DONE AND ENTERED this 28th day of June, 2000, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. DANIEL MANRY Administrative Law Judge Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building 1230 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060 (850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675 Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 28th day of June, 2000. COPIES FURNISHED: Ross Fleetwood, Director Division of Florida Land Sales, Condominiums and Mobile Homes Department of Business and Professional Regulation 1940 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0792 Scott K. Edmonds Assistant General Counsel Department of Business and Professional Regulation 1940 North Monroe Street, Suite 60 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2202 Thomas C. Houck, Esquire 312 South Harbor City Boulevard Melbourne, Florida 32901 Barbara D. Auger, General Counsel Department of Business and Professional Regulation 1940 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0792

Florida Laws (5) 120.57120.68326.004326.006489.129 Florida Administrative Code (1) 61B-60.003
# 5
WILLIAMSON CADILLAC COMPANY, D/B/A WILLIAMSON CADILLAC BUICK GMC vs GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, AND OCEAN CADILLAC, INC., 13-003240 (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Bay Harbor Islands, Florida Aug. 23, 2013 Number: 13-003240 Latest Update: Jun. 19, 2014

Conclusions This matter came before the Department for entry of a Final Order upon submission of an Order Closing Files and Relinquishing Jurisdiction by Jessica E. Varn an Administrative Law Judge of the Division of Administrative Hearings, and the Respondent’s withdrawal of intent to relocate Ocean Cadillac, Inc., copies of which are attached and incorporated by reference in this order. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. DONE AND ORDERED this |! ) day of June, 2014, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. Filed in the official records of the Division of ice ix Motorist Services this day of June, Bureau of Issuance Oversight 2014. Division of Motorist Services Department of Highway Safety and _ D le Motor Vehicles Tobin: Grroyel COTES Neil Kirkman Building, Room A338 Nalini Vinayak, Dealer License Administrator Tallahassee, Florida 32399 Filed June 19, 2014 7:35 AM Division of Administrative Hearings Copies furnished to: Nalini Vinayak Dealer License Section R. Craig Spickard, Esquire Kurkin Brandes, LLP 105 West Sth Avenue Tallahassee, Florida 32303 cspickard@kb-attorneys.com C. Gregory Feil Ocean Cadillac, Inc. 1000 Kane Concourse Miami, Florida 33154 John Martin General Motors, LLC Mail Code 482-A82-A16-C66 100 GM Renaissance Center Detroit, Michigan 48265 Jessica E. Varn Administrative Law Judge Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building 1230 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550 NOTICE OF APPEAL RIGHTS Judicial review of this order may be had pursuant to section 120.68, Florida Statutes, in the District Court of Appeal for the First District, State of Florida, or in any other district court of appeal of this state in an appellate district where a party resides. In order to initiate such review, one copy of the notice of appeal must be filed with the Department and the other copy of the notice of appeal, together with the filing fee, must be filed with the court within thirty days of the filing date of this order as set out above, pursuant to Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Florida Laws (1) 120.68
# 7
CONTEMPORARY CARS, INC., D/B/A MERCEDES-BENZ OF ORLANDO vs MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, 12-003497 (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Maitland, Florida Oct. 25, 2012 Number: 12-003497 Latest Update: Nov. 08, 2012

Conclusions This matter came before the Department for entry of a Final Order upon submission of an Order Closing File and Relinquishing Jurisdiction by William F. Quattlebaum, Administrative Law Judge of the Division of Administrative Hearings, pursuant to Petitioner’s Notice Of Dismissal, a copy of which is attached and incorporated by reference in this order. The Department hereby adopts the Order Closing File and Relinquishing Jurisdiction as its Final Order in this matter. Accordingly, it is hereby Filed November 8, 2012 8:23 AM Division of Administrative Hearings ORDERED that this case is CLOSED. DONE AND ORDERED this q day of November, 2012, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. uréau of Issuance Oversight Division of Motorist Services Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Neil Kirkman Building, Room A338 Tallahassee, Florida 32399 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Motorist Services this day of November, 2012. ian Lipegele NOTICE OF APPEAL RIGHTS Judicial review of this order may be had pursuant to section 120.68, Florida Statutes, in the District Court of Appeal for the First District, State of Florida, or in any other district court of appeal of this state in an appellate district where a party resides. In order to initiate such review, one copy of the notice of appeal must be filed with the Department and the other copy of the notice of appeal, together with the filing fee, must be filed with the court within thirty days of the filing date of this order as set out above, pursuant to Rules of Appellate Procedure. JB/jde Copies furnished: R. Craig Spickard, Esquire Kurkin Forehand Brandes, LLP 800 North Calhoun Street, Suite 1B Tallahassee, Florida 32303 cspickard@kfb-law.com Eric C. Shepherd Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC 1 Mercedes Drive Montvale, New Jersey 07645 J. Andrew Bertron, Esquire Nelson, Mullins, Riley And Scarborough, LLP 3600 Maclay Boulevard South, Suite 202 Tallahassee, Florida 32312 andy.bertron@nelsonmullins.com William F. Quattlebaum Administrative Law Judge Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building 1230 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550 Nalini Vinayak Dealer License Administrator “tree Bs:

# 9
ECO GREEN MACHINE, LLC vs PEACE POWER SPORTS, INC., AND MAD BEACH SCOOTERS, INC., 13-001680 (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:St. Petersburg, Florida May 10, 2013 Number: 13-001680 Latest Update: Jun. 19, 2014

Conclusions This matter came before the Department for entry of a Final Order upon submission of an Order Closing File and Relinquishing Jurisdiction by John D. C. Newton, II, Administrative Law Judge of the Division of Administrative Hearings, pursuant to Respondent’s Notice of Withdrawal, a copy of which is attached and incorporated by reference in this order. The Department hereby adopts the Order Closing File and Relinquishing Jurisdiction as its Final Order in this matter. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this case is CLOSED and no license will be issued to Peace Power Sports, Inc. and Mad Beach Scooters, Inc. to sell motorcycles manufactured by Chongqing Astronautical Bashan Motorcycle Manufacturer Co. Ltd., (BASH) at 6239 Park Boulevard, Pinellas Park (Pinellas County), Florida 33781. Filed June 19, 2014 7:32 AM Division of Administrative Hearings DONE AND ORDERED this ] / day of June, 2014, in Tallahassee, Leon County, e Florida. Filed in the official records o Motorist Services this \ 2014. VWotn: O. (s Nalini Vinayak, Dealer License Administrator Copies furnished to: Nalini Vinayak Dealer License Section Kristine M. Lawson Mad Beach Scooters, Inc. 6239 Park Boulevard Coburs Julie Baker, Chief Bureau of Issuance Oversight Division of Motorist Services Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Neil Kirkman Building, Room A338 Tallahassee, Florida 32399 Fang Liu Peace Power Sports, Inc. 2533 Royal Lane, Suite 505 Dallas, Texas 75229 John D. C. Newton, II Administrative Law Judge Division of Administrative Hearings Pinellas Park, Florida 33781 The DeSoto Building 1230 Apalachee Parkway Pat Clark Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550 Eco Green Machine, LLC 7000 Park Boulevard Pinellas Park, Florida 33781 NOTICE OF APPEAL RIGHTS Judicial review of this order may be had pursuant to section 120.68, Florida Statutes, in the District Court of Appeal for the First District, State of Florida, or in any other district court of appeal of this state in an appellate district where a party resides. In order to initiate such review, one copy of the notice of appeal must be filed with the Department and the other copy of the notice of appeal, together with the filing fee, must be filed with the court within thirty days of the filing date of this order as set out above, pursuant to Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Florida Laws (1) 120.68
# 10

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer