Findings Of Fact Petitioner applied for benefits under the LIHEAP program in December 1984 with the assistance of Teresa Lopez, a friend who handles paperwork for him. Ms. Lopez sent the application to Respondent and it was received by Respondent on December 17, 1984 which was the deadline date for applications. Respondent returned Petitioner's application since it had not been dated prior to submission. Ms. Lopez then had Petitioner back date his application with the date December 13, 1984 and resubmit it. When it was received by Respondent this second time, it was after the December 17 deadline and was therefore rejected as late filed. The only deficiency in Petitioner's application when it was initially submitted and received on December 17 was that it was not dated.
Recommendation Based upon the foregoing, it is recommended that a Final Order be issued denying Petitioner's application for benefits. DONE and ENTERED this 2nd day of May, 1985 at Tallahassee, Florida. Hearings Hearings DONALD D. CONN, Hearing Officer Division of Administrative The Oakland Building 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative this 2nd day of May, 1985. COPIES FURNISHED: James A. Perry 1821 Middle River Drive #15 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33305 Harold Braynon, Esquire Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 201 West Broward Boulevard Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 David Pingree, Secretary Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1323 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32301
Findings Of Fact The Petitioner timely applied on November 30, 1984 for home energy assistance under the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program as authorized by Title XXVI of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981 (Public Law 97-35). Petitioners' only income was "unearned income" which was their monthly social security benefit payments which totalled $561.00. No monthly medicare premiums were deducted from Petitioners' monthly social security payments. The Respondent in calculating Petitioners' verified monthly income added a total of $29.20 back into Petitioners' total monthly income of $561.00 for an adjusted total verified monthly income of $590.20. On April 10, 1985 Respondent officially notified Petitioners that the monthly income of $590.20 exceeded the monthly income limit ($560.00) for their household. Respondent upon discovering that medicare premiums were not deducted from Petitioners' monthly social security payments readjusted Petitioners' total verified household income to $561.00. Petitioners agree that their verified monthly income during the month of application was $561.00. The monthly income limit for a household the size of Petitioners' as determined under Rule lOC-29.13, Florida Administrative Code is $560.00. Petitioners had no excludable income. Other than exceeding the monthly income limit of $560.00 for household the size of Petitioners', the Petitioners were eligible for assistance under the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program.
Recommendation Based upon the findings of facts and conclusions of law recited herein, it is RECOMMENDED that the Respondent enter Final Order denying the Petitioners' application for assistance under the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program. Respectfully submitted and entered this 19th of August, 1985, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. WILLIAM R. CAVE Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (904) 488-9675 FILED with the clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 19th day of August, 1985. COPIES FURNISHED: Harold Braynon, Esq. HRS District Ten Legal Counsel 201 West Broward Boulevard Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-1885 Charles V. and Helen Tokarski 6804 N.W. 29th Street, Lot 1, Block 32 Margate, FL 33063 Susan Kirkland, Esq. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1323 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32301 David Pingree Secretary 1323 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32301 ================================================================ =
The Issue Whether Petitioner is eligible for low income energy assistance as provided in Section 409.508, Florida Statutes (1980) Home Energy Assistance Program; Rules 10 CER 81-5 through 81-13, Low Income Energy Assistance Program, amended by Rules 10 CER 81-16 and 81-17, Florida Administrative Code.
Findings Of Fact Petitioner Ruby P. Hutchinson requested a formal hearing after the required informal conference with a supervisor employed by Respondent Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services. On June 23, 1981, Hutchinson, who lives alone, filed a Household Application for low income energy assistance with the required Medical Certification for Cooling. By Notice of Application Denial Petitioner was informed that she was denied assistance for the reason that her monthly household income exceeded the maximum income limits for a household of her size. The action was taken within 45 days of Petitioner's application and she was promptly notified of the reason for denial of benefit. Petitioner did not dispute the evidence presented by Respondent Department but felt that assistance should have been based on need. Hutchinson's monthly household income during the month of her application was $352.30.
Recommendation Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the Hearing Officer recommends that a final order be entered by the Respondent Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services denying low income energy benefits to Petitioner. DONE and ORDERED this 15th day of December, 1981, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 15th day of December, 1981 in Tallahassee, Florida. COPIES FURNISHED: Ruby P. Hutchinson 1715 North Combee Road Lakeland, Florida 33805 Anthony N. DeLuccia, Jr., Esquire Department of HRS 8800 Cleveland Avenue, South Post Office Box 06085 Fort Myers, Florida 33907 David H. Pingree, Secretary Attn: Susan B. Kirkland, Esquire Department of HRS Building One, Room 406 1323 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32301
The Issue The matters presented concern the question of the entitlement of Petitioner to be granted low income home energy assistance.
Findings Of Fact Petitioner Barbara J. Eubanks resided at 1422 Madison Street, Palatka, Florida, from the middle of 1982 through the initial part of 1983. While residing at that address, Eubanks made application for low income energy assistance to heat her home. In particular, she applied for assistance related to natural gas. She made this application by appearing at an office staffed by Respondent. She utilized a form, namely, HRS-ES Form 1036-October 82. This form was provided by Respondent and is entitled Household Application for Home Energy Assistance. Question No. 8 on that form relates to the income of Petitioner, to include acknowledgment of income received from AFTC or SSI. That form does not by its terms indicate that income information must be documented through an official document, paper or photo copy for purposes of records of the Respondent, nor does it indicate that the application form related to income must be verified by actions of Respondent in checking departmental records or through telephone calls or personal contact with the source of the income or official of a living facility. Neither does the application form alert the applicant to the fact that the Respondent may request additional information related to verification of income by mailing out a separate request to the applicant with the expectation that the applicant shall respond to the request for additional information within no less than ten working days. Finally, Petitioner was not presented with a copy of Rule 10C-29.11, Florida Administrative Code, which deals with the verification and documentation process, to include the discussion of how documentation and verification is obtained by the Department. Consequently, Petitioner was unaware of the necessity for documentation or verification of her income information. Petitioner's Exhibit No. 1 admitted into evidence is a copy of the application submitted on November 26, 1982. Following a review of the application, Respondent determined that sufficient verification of income had not been provided to the agency. This decision was reached notwithstanding the fact that the application form did not explain the necessity for verification of income. After the determination, a Form HRS-ES 2650 was mailed to the address given by the applicant in her application document, requesting her to verify information related to her income. This request was sent out on December 13, 1983, and it instructed Petitioner to comply with the request for information on or before December 28, 1982. A copy of this form may be found as Respondent's Exhibit No. 1 admitted into evidence. The form was sent by ordinary mail and was not returned to the Respondent. At the time of its transmittal, Petitioner was a permanent resident at the 1422 Madison Street address; however, due to an illness she was living with her sister at another address in Palatka, Florida. It was Petitioner's expectation that any mail which she received at the Madison Street address would be forwarded to her by her stepmother. Petitioner did not receive the request for additional information in spite of the efforts by Respondent to transmit it to her and the efforts by Petitioner to receive her mail. During the course of her illness in November and December of 1982, she did not advise Respondent that she would be living at another address part-time. When Respondent failed to hear from Petitioner on the question of additional information related to income verification, it dispatched a Notice of Denial of Assistance on February 4, 1983. A copy of that notice of denial may be found as Petitioner's Exhibit No. 2 admitted into evidence. That notice advised the Petitioner that she had been denied her request for assistance for failing to provide information requested by offering a written response. Prior to the date of the notice of denial, Petitioner had not complied with the request for income information, being unmindful of that request. (In the year 1982, the Petitioner worked for approximately four weeks in the capacity of a laborer, in particular a field worker at $3.65 an hour wages.) Petitioner did receive notification of denial at her Madison Street address and in keeping with the opportunity expressed in that notification requested an administrative hearing to consider her entitlement to be granted the assistance. That request for administrative hearing was made on February 10, 1983. The matter was transmitted to the Division of Administrative Hearings on March 10, 1983, and a final hearing was scheduled for May 19, 1983. That hearing was not held because of the non-attendance of the Petitioner due to her incarceration. The hearing was subsequently rescheduled to be heard on August 31, 1983, after making arrangements to have Petitioner produced at the hearing by the Putnam County Sheriff's Office. The hearing was held on that date. At the time of hearing, the Respondent had been incarcerated for a period of approximately four months and is subject to release in November 1983. Upon her release, it is unknown where the Petitioner will reside.
Findings Of Fact Petitioner Herbert Dean requested a hearing on April 22, 1981. After the required informal conference with a supervisor in Respondent Department Petitioner requested a formal hearing. On January 16, 1981 Dean, a white male, filed a Household Application for low in home energy assistance. No one in his household is a migrant or migrant farm worker, and no one else applied for the low income energy assistance. He lives with one other person in Dunnellon, Florida, receives food stamps and receives a bill for the use of wood for heating purposes. Petitioner was issued a check in the amount of $36.00 to assist him in paying his heating costs for the month of January. The action was taken by Respondent within 45 days of Petitioner's application, and he as promptly paid low income energy assistance benefits. Petitioner did not dispute the evidence presented by Respondent, the facts of his residence or income, or the type of fuel used but stated that wood was expensive and his primary source of heat, although he used electricity for fuel at times. He said that the $36.00 he received did not help him much and be till owed a light bill of $148.17. His income is $258.00 monthly. Respondent's witness produced the signed application of Petitioner, a map of the State of Florida depicting four (4) climatic regions and a chart for determining the amount of low income energy assistance heating payments for each of the four (4) regions based on monthly income of the applicant and the type of fuel used for fully vulnerable and partially vulnerable households. he amount of $36.00 was the correct amount according to the chart under the facts provided by Petitioner.
Recommendation Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law the Hearing Officer recommends that a final order be entered approving the amount of Low Income Energy Assistance Program benefits allocated to Petitioner Herbert Dean. DONE and ORDERED this 11th day of June, 1981, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 11th day of June, 1981. COPIES FURNISHED: Mr. Herbert Dean Post Office Box 652 Dunnellon, Florida 32630 James A. Sawyer, Esquire Department of HRS 3001 SW Broadway Ocala, Florida 32671 Alvin J. Taylor, Secretary Attn: Susan B. Kirkland, Esquire Department of HRS Building One, Room 406 1323 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32301
Findings Of Fact Petitioner is a single parent and the head of a household comprising herself and her two children. In her application, Exhibit 1, Petitioner lists her monthly income at $800. The accuracy of this figure was not contested at the hearing. Based upon this income Respondent determined Petitioner was not eligible for Low-Income Home Energy Assistance and denied her application. Petitioner does not contend that she was unfairly discriminated against or that Respondent failed to comply with the regulations determining eligibility for Low-income Energy Assistance payments. Petitioner's sole argument is that because she works to support her family she is denied these payments, while others who are too indolent to work are given these payments from the taxes Petitioner pays.
Findings Of Fact Ms. McGhee, the Petitioner, resides at 3807 West Columbia Street, Orlando, Florida. She filed an application for home energy assistance benefits on November 7, 1983. On that application she indicated household income for three persons: Maycia McGhee-$324 per month in Disability and 551; Pamela McGhee-$108 per month from CETA; Stephanie McGhee-$231 per month in AFDC. Ernita Bradley, an HRS employee, was the only person who reviewed and handled Ms. McGhee's case. Ms. Bradley reviewed this application and determined that additional information was needed. Specifically, Ms. McGhee needed to furnish the ages of Stephanie and Pamela; the number of handicapped persons in the household; and income verification from CETA and 551 Disability for the month of November, 1983. Ms. McGhee went to the HRS office on November 28, 1983. She does not recall why she went, but she did see Ms. Bradley on that date. What occurred during that meeting is the source of the present conflict. Ms. McGhee testified that she had the CETA verification from Orange County Vocational with her on November 28, 1983, and that she gave that information to Ms. Bradley. She also stated that she does not recall being asked for the ages of Stephanie and Pamela or the number of handicapped in the household. Ms. McGhee was unable to offer an explanation of how she knew she needed a CETA income verification statement on November 28, 1983, but she just somehow knew that she needed it. Ms. McGhee also acknowledges that during this meeting Ms. Bradley informed her that she was getting ready to send her a letter and instead handed her a letter dated November 28, 1983 requesting the additional information set forth above. Ms. McGhee acknowledges that she did nothing further in regard to her application after the November 28, 1983, meeting because she didn't know that she needed to supply any additional information. Ernita Bradley testified that she recalled Ms. McGhee's visit on November 28, 1983, and she furnished notes that she made the same day as the visit to substantiate her testimony. These notes contained in Respondent's Exhibit 2 and Ms. Bradley's testimony establish that on November 28, 1983, Ms. McGhee came to Ms. Bradley's office and supplied some of the requested information. Ms. McGhee furnished the ages of Stephanie and Pamela and stated that she was the only person disabled in the household. Ms. Bradley testified that she told Ms. McGhee that the SSI verification was not necessary because she had verified that income from the HRS computer. Ms. Bradley emphasized to Ms. McGhee that she needed to bring a check stub or income verification of the CETA income for Pamela. Ms. Bradley further testified that Ms. McGhee stated that she would bring that information. Ms. Bradley beard nothing further from Ms. McGhee. The letter, Respondent's Exhibit 1, gave until December 12, 1983, for Ms. McGhee to furnish the information. Ms. Bradley testified that she gave Ms. McGhee ten more days to get the CETA verification, but after waiting until December 20, 1983, Ms. Bradley denied the application because the verification of CETA income was never received. Because the conflict between the testimony of Ms. Bradley and the testimony of Ms. McGhee must be resolved, it is found that the testimony of Ms. Bradley is more persuasive. This finding is based on the existence of notes made by Ms. Bradley contemporaneous with the events and the vague and imprecise testimony of Ms. McGhee, especially as to details. It is additionally found that Ms. McGhee did not submit verification of the CETA income as requested. Additionally, she did not bring that information with her to the hearing in this matter either.
Recommendation Upon consideration of the foregoing Findings of Pact and Conclusions of Law, it is RECOMMENDED that Respondent deny Petitioner's application for benefits under the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program. DONE and ENTERED this 23rd day of April, 1984, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. COPIES FURNISHED: Maycia McGhee 3807 West Columbia Street Orlando, Florida 32805 Gerry Clark, Esquire District Legal Counsel Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 400 West Robinson, Suite 912 Orlando, Florida 32801 David H. Pingree, Secretary Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1323 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32301 DIANE K. KIESLING Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (904)488-9675 FILED with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 23rd day of April, 1984.
The Issue Whether Petitioner is eligible for low income energy assistance as provided in Section 409.508, Florida Statutes (1980), Home Energy Assistance Program; Rules 10 CER 81-5 through 81-13, Low Income Energy Assistance Program, amended by Rules 10 CER 81-16 and 81-17, Florida Administrative Code.
Findings Of Fact Petitioner Mary Cecelia Williams requested a formal hearing after the required informal conference with a supervisor employed by Respondent Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services. On June 28, 1981 Williams, a black female who lives with two other person , filed a Household Application for low income energy assistance together with a medical certificate (Form 137 May 81) which had the words "which would be life-threatening" crossed out by the physician. She was notified on July 2, 1981 that the application was denied for the reason that the physician did not indicate the need for cooling services was life-threatening. Petitioner did not dispute the fact the medical certification was altered but stated at the hearing that she had no money to see another physician. Both Petitioner and her son have breathing difficulties and she believes her application for cooling benefits should be reconsidered.
Recommendation Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law the Hearing Officer recommends that a final order be entered by the Respondent Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services denying low income energy benefits to Petitioner. DONE and ORDERED this 11th day of December, 1981, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND Hearing Officer Department of Administration Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 11th day of December, 1981. COPIES FURNISHED: Mary Cecelia Williams 1112 NW Seventh Avenue Gainesville, Florida 32601 James Sawyer, Esquire Department of HRS 2002 NW 13th Street Oak Park Executive Square Gainesville, Florida 32601 David H. Pingree, Secretary Attn: Susan B. Kirkland, Esquire Department of HRS Building One, Room 406 1323 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32301
The Issue Whether Petitioner is eligible for additional low income energy assistance under Section 409.508, Florida Statutes (1980), Energy Assistance Program; Rule 10 CER 80-11, Low Income Energy Assistance Program, amended by Rule 10 CER 81-4, Florida Administrative Code.
Findings Of Fact Petitioner Alma T. Camiel requested a hearing on April 3, 1981. After the require informal conference with a supervisor in Respondent Department Petitioner requested a formal hearing. On January 28, 198 Camiel, a black female, filed a Household Application for low income energy assistance. No one in her household is a migrant or migrant farm worker, and no one else applied for the low income energy assistance. She lives alone in Lake City, Florida, receives food stamps and receives a bill for the use of wood for heating purposes. Petitioner was issued a check in the amount of $47.00 to assist her in paying her heating costs for the month of January. The action was taken by Respondent within 45 days of Petitioner's application, and she was promptly paid low income energy assistance benefits. Petitioner did not dispute the evidence presented by Respondent, the facts of her residence or income, or the type of fuel used but stated that wood was expensive and her primary source of heat, although she used other types of fuel at times. She had expected more money since others received more benefits under the program, particularly if they used electricity as a primary source of beat. Respondent's witness produced the signed application of Petitioner, a map of the State of Florida depicting four (4) climatic regions and a chart for determining the amount of low income energy assistance boating payments for each of the four (4) regions based on monthly income of the application and the type of fuel used for fully vulnerable and partially vulnerable households. The amount of $47.00 was the correct amount according to the chart odor the facts provided by Petitioner.
Recommendation Based on the foregoing findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law the Hearing Officer recommends that a final order be entered approving the amount of Low Income Energy Assistance Program benefits allocated to Petitioner Alma T. Camiel. DONE and ORDERED this 5th day of June, 1991, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 5th day of June, 1981. COPIES FURNISHED: Ms. Alma T. Camiel 107 North Street Lake City, Florida 32055 Joseph E. Hodges, Esquire Department of HRS Oak Park Executive Square Gainesville, Florida 32601 Alvin J. Taylor, Secretary Attn: Susan E. Kirkland, Esquire Department of HRS Building One, Room 406 323 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32301
Findings Of Fact Petitioner lives alone in a public housing project where she pays only a portion of her rent. She has extraordinary medical expenses as a result of a degenerative disease. Petitioner receives $377 monthly in Social Security benefits. After deducting the premium for Medicare, Petitioner's income is $360. Petitioner made application for low income energy assistance benefits for her home cooling costs. Respondent denied that application for benefits for the sole reason that Petitioner's income exceeds the maximum income permitted.
Recommendation Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is, therefore, RECOMMENDED THAT: A final order be entered denying Petitioner's application for Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program benefits. RECOMMENDED this 15th day of September, 1982, in Tallahassee, Florida. LINDA M. RIGOT Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 15th day of September, 1982. COPIES FURNISHED: Ms. Patricia Margaret Remer 1310 Northwest 16th Street Apartment 410 Miami, Florida 33125 Leonard Helfand, Esquire Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 401 Northwest Second Avenue Suite 1040 Miami, Florida 33128 Mr. David Pingree Secretary Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1323 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32301
