The Issue Whether Petitioner is eligible for low income energy assistance as provided in Section 409.508, Florida Statutes (1980), Home Energy Assistance Program; Rules 10 CER 81-5 through 81-13, Low Income Energy Assistance Program, amended by Rules 10 CER 81-16 and 81-17, Florida Administrative Code.
Findings Of Fact Petitioner Lucy Jeffery requested a formal hearing after the required informal conference with a supervisor employed by Respondent Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services. On June 9, 1981 Jeffery, at that time living with three (3) other people, filed a Household Application for low income energy assistance with the required Medical Certification (Form 137, May '81). By Notice of Application Denial Petitioner was informed that she was denied assistance for the reason that her medical statement indicated her medical condition did not require cooling in order to prevent "life-threatening" adverse effects. The action was taken within 45 days of Petitioner's application, and she was promptly notified of the reason for denial of benefits. The medical practitioner who signed the Medical Certification for Cooling wrote the words "Gastro intestinal condition not life threatening but medically prudent" before he signed the form. Petitioner did not dispute the evidence presented but felt that her medical condition warranted cooling and that she should be allowed benefits for that purpose.
Recommendation Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law the Hearing Officer recommends that a final order be entered by the Respondent Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services denying low income energy benefits to Petitioner. DONE and ORDERED this 10th day of February, 1982, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 10th day of February, 1982. COPIES FURNISHED: Ms. Lucy Jeffery 1849 21st Street Sarasota, Florida 33580 Anthony N. DeLuccia, Jr., Esquire Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 8800 Cleveland Avenue, South Post Office Box 06085 Fort Myers, Florida 33907 David H. Pingree, Secretary Attn: Susan B. Kirkland, Esquire Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services Building One, Room 406 1323 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32301
The Issue The matters presented concern the question of the entitlement of Petitioner to be granted low income home energy assistance.
Findings Of Fact Petitioner Barbara J. Eubanks resided at 1422 Madison Street, Palatka, Florida, from the middle of 1982 through the initial part of 1983. While residing at that address, Eubanks made application for low income energy assistance to heat her home. In particular, she applied for assistance related to natural gas. She made this application by appearing at an office staffed by Respondent. She utilized a form, namely, HRS-ES Form 1036-October 82. This form was provided by Respondent and is entitled Household Application for Home Energy Assistance. Question No. 8 on that form relates to the income of Petitioner, to include acknowledgment of income received from AFTC or SSI. That form does not by its terms indicate that income information must be documented through an official document, paper or photo copy for purposes of records of the Respondent, nor does it indicate that the application form related to income must be verified by actions of Respondent in checking departmental records or through telephone calls or personal contact with the source of the income or official of a living facility. Neither does the application form alert the applicant to the fact that the Respondent may request additional information related to verification of income by mailing out a separate request to the applicant with the expectation that the applicant shall respond to the request for additional information within no less than ten working days. Finally, Petitioner was not presented with a copy of Rule 10C-29.11, Florida Administrative Code, which deals with the verification and documentation process, to include the discussion of how documentation and verification is obtained by the Department. Consequently, Petitioner was unaware of the necessity for documentation or verification of her income information. Petitioner's Exhibit No. 1 admitted into evidence is a copy of the application submitted on November 26, 1982. Following a review of the application, Respondent determined that sufficient verification of income had not been provided to the agency. This decision was reached notwithstanding the fact that the application form did not explain the necessity for verification of income. After the determination, a Form HRS-ES 2650 was mailed to the address given by the applicant in her application document, requesting her to verify information related to her income. This request was sent out on December 13, 1983, and it instructed Petitioner to comply with the request for information on or before December 28, 1982. A copy of this form may be found as Respondent's Exhibit No. 1 admitted into evidence. The form was sent by ordinary mail and was not returned to the Respondent. At the time of its transmittal, Petitioner was a permanent resident at the 1422 Madison Street address; however, due to an illness she was living with her sister at another address in Palatka, Florida. It was Petitioner's expectation that any mail which she received at the Madison Street address would be forwarded to her by her stepmother. Petitioner did not receive the request for additional information in spite of the efforts by Respondent to transmit it to her and the efforts by Petitioner to receive her mail. During the course of her illness in November and December of 1982, she did not advise Respondent that she would be living at another address part-time. When Respondent failed to hear from Petitioner on the question of additional information related to income verification, it dispatched a Notice of Denial of Assistance on February 4, 1983. A copy of that notice of denial may be found as Petitioner's Exhibit No. 2 admitted into evidence. That notice advised the Petitioner that she had been denied her request for assistance for failing to provide information requested by offering a written response. Prior to the date of the notice of denial, Petitioner had not complied with the request for income information, being unmindful of that request. (In the year 1982, the Petitioner worked for approximately four weeks in the capacity of a laborer, in particular a field worker at $3.65 an hour wages.) Petitioner did receive notification of denial at her Madison Street address and in keeping with the opportunity expressed in that notification requested an administrative hearing to consider her entitlement to be granted the assistance. That request for administrative hearing was made on February 10, 1983. The matter was transmitted to the Division of Administrative Hearings on March 10, 1983, and a final hearing was scheduled for May 19, 1983. That hearing was not held because of the non-attendance of the Petitioner due to her incarceration. The hearing was subsequently rescheduled to be heard on August 31, 1983, after making arrangements to have Petitioner produced at the hearing by the Putnam County Sheriff's Office. The hearing was held on that date. At the time of hearing, the Respondent had been incarcerated for a period of approximately four months and is subject to release in November 1983. Upon her release, it is unknown where the Petitioner will reside.
Findings Of Fact Based upon my observation of the witnesses and their demeanor while testifying, documentary evidence received and the entire record compiled herein, I hereby make the following relevant factual findings. On November 27, 1984, Petitioner filed an application for assistance and benefits under the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LEAP). Her application was timely reviewed by Linda Peterson, an analyst with the Respondent who is involved with the processing of applications received under the LEAP program. (Respondent's Composite Exhibit 1) Petitioner's application revealed that she received $435 during the month of November 1984, the month of her application for benefits under the LEAP program. By written notice dated February 6, 1985, Petitioner was advised that her application for assistance under the LEAP program was denied in accordance witch Chapter 409.026 and .508, Florida Statutes, and Rules 10C- 29.05, .09 and .13, Florida Administrative Code. Specifically, she was advised that her gross cash income received was $435 and that the maximum monthly income limit for her household during the month of application was $415. As stated, Petitioner, or a representative on her behalf, did not appear at the hearing.
Recommendation Based upon the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, it is hereby recommended that the Respondent, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, enter a final order denying Petitioner's application for assistance under the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program. RECOMMENDED this 28th day of June, 1985, in Tallahassee, Florida. JAMES E. BRADWELL Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 28th day of June, 1985.
The Issue Whether Petitioner is eligible for low income energy assistance as provided in Chapter 80-167, Laws of Florida; Rule 10 CER 80-11, amended by Rule 10 CER 81-4.08 through 4.11, Florida Administrative Code.
Findings Of Fact Petitioner Gregg Hilbert requested a hearing on February 24, 1981, and an informal conference with a supervisor in Respondent Department was held. On January 24, 1981 Hilbert, a white male, filed a Household Application for low income energy assistance. No one in his household is a migrant or migrant farm worker, and no one else has applied for the low income energy assistance. He lived with four (4) other persons and receives a bill for use of liquid propane for heating. By Notice of Application Denial mailed February 20, 1981 Petitioner was informed that he was denied assistance for the reason that he failed to furnish specified information as to the size of his household. Action was taken by Respondent within 45 days of Petitioner's application, and he was promptly notified of the reason for denial of benefits. Petitioner did not include on his application a person living in his household during the month he applied for benefits, and he also failed to furnish verification of his income within the specified deadline of ten (10) working days. He failed to appear at the hearing although he had 14 days notice of the hearing and telephone notice from Respondent.
Recommendation Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law the Hearing Officer recommends that low income energy benefits be denied Petitioner. DONE and ORDERED this 24th day of April, 1981, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 24th day of April, 1981. COPIES FURNISHED: Mr. Gregg Hilbert 169 West King Street St. Augustine, Florida 32084 Paul C. Doyle, Esquire Department of HRS 5920 Arlington Expressway Post Office Box 2417-F Jacksonville, Florida 32231 Alvin J. Taylor, Secretary Attn: Susan B. Kirkland, Esquire Department of HRS Building One, Room 406 1323 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32301
The Issue Whether Petitioner is eligible for low income energy assistance as provided in Section 409.508, Florida Statutes (1980), Home Energy Assistance Program; Rules 10 CER 81-6 through 81-13, Low Income Energy Assistance Program, amended by Rules 10 CER 81-16 and 81-17, Florida Administrative Code.
Findings Of Fact Petitioner Rosa Jackson requested a formal hearing after the required informal conference with a supervisor employed by Respondent Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services. On July 7, 1981 Jackson, a black female who lives alone, filed a Household Application for low income energy assistance. She was notified on July 5, 1981 that the application must be accompanied by a Medical Certification for Cooling, and she was requested to submit the certificate that had been forwarded to her. She failed to file the certificate, and another form was forwarded to her on September 3, 1981. No medical certificate has been filed. Petitioner stated at the Hearing that she had intended to mail it but never did. She did not have the required medical certificate with her at the hearing.
Recommendation Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law the Hearing Officer recommends that a final order be entered by the Respondent Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services denying low income energy benefits to Petitioner. DONE and ORDERED this 4th day of December, 1981, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 4th day of December, 1981. COPIES FURNISHED: Ms. Rosa Jackson Route 5, Box 61 Elbert Lane Pensacola, Florida 32503 Jon Searcy, Esquire Department of HRS 160 Governmental Center Post Office Box 12836 Pensacola, Florida 32576 David H. Pingree, Secretary Attn: Susan B. Kirkland, Esquire Department of HRS Building One, Room 406 1323 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32301
Findings Of Fact Based upon my observation of the witnesses and their demeanor while testifying, the documentary evidence received and the entire record compiled herein, the following relevant facts are found. Mary T. Gabor is the daughter of Anna C. Ruwell, Petitioner herein. On April 20, 1982, Ms. Gabor submitted an application to the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program requesting that she (Petitioner) be determined eligible to receive Low Income Energy Assistance. The application was not signed or dated. On May 27, 1983, the application submitted on behalf of Petitioner was returned by Respondent "as it is unsigned and dated and is not acceptable since the signed application has to be postmarked by April 23, 1982, to be acceptable. Ms. Gabor operated under the assumption that she could complete the application on behalf of her mother (Petitioner), inasmuch as she was her mother's authorized representative in other assistance or entitlement programs such as food stamps, etc. Evidence reveals that Petitioner's application was received in the Energy Assistance Program's office on April 20, 1982. The program closed for the acceptance of applications on April 23, 1982. Respondent submitted a request to Petitioner by letter dated May 14, 1982, for additional information as to the amount of her Social Security award. Petitioner was allowed through May 28, 1982, to provide the requested information. That letter prompted Ms. Gabor to call the Energy Assistance Program on May 21, 1982. In the May 14th request for additional information, Petitioner was directed to sign and date the application. Approximately six (6) days later, on May 27, 1982, Ms. Ruwell's application was returned as unacceptable due to the above-referred omissions (absence of signature and date). Petitoner's application was one (1) of approximately seventeen hundred (1,700) applications received by the Energy Assistance Program during the last five (5) days of the filing period. Due to the substantial number of applications received by the Energy Assistance Program, Petitioner's omissions were not noticed until after the April 23, 1982, deadline. Ms. Gabor feels that she is entitled to an exception to the above- referred omissions based on Petitioner's elderly age and the fact that she would have been declared eligible but for the absence of Petitioner's signature on the application.
Recommendation Based on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, it is hereby RECOMMENDED: 1. That Respondent submit to Petitioner a request for the additional information and afford her an opportunity to provide that missing or incomplete information within ten (10) days of the request for such information. Provided Petitioner furnishes Respondent with the additional information requested within the allowable ten (10) day period and the application otherwise satisfies the guiding criteria, it is further RECOMMENDED: That she be determined and otherwise declared eligible for participation in the Home Energy Assistance Program. RECOMMENDED this 15th day of September, 1982, in Tallahassee, Florida. JAMES E. BRADWELL Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 15th day of September, 1982.
Findings Of Fact Petitioner Fred A. Newman requested a hearing by a letter dated February 28, 1981. After the required informal conference with a supervisor in Respondent Department Petitioner requested a formal hearing. Petitioner failed to appear at both the first and second scheduled hearings. On January 22, 1981 Newman, a white male, filed a Household Application for low income energy assistance. No one in his household is a migrant or migrant farm worker, and no one else has applied for the low income energy assistance. He lives with one other person, receives food stamps and receives a bill for use of liquid propane for heating. By Notice of Application Denial mailed February 5, 1981 Petitioner was informed that he was denied assistance for the reason that his monthly income exceeded the maximum income for a household of his size. Tie action was taken by Respondent within 45 days of Petitioner's application, and he was promptly notified of the reason for denial Of benefits. Petitioner did not appear. Respondent presented avidence (Respondent's Composite Exhibit 1) which shows that Petitioner has a gross combined income of $428.00 per month. Under Rule 10 CER 80-11.07, Determination of Eligibility Based on Income, Florida Administrative Code, and the applicable chart Petitioner Newman's household income exceeds the income limit of $418.00 for a household of two (2) persons.
Recommendation Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law the Hearing Officer recommends that low income energy benefits be denied Petitioner. DONE and ORDERED this 13th day of May, 1981, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 13th day of May, 1981. COPIES FURNISHED: Mr. Fred A. Newman RD 2, Box 214 (Mulberry Street, Lake Weir Village) Oklawaha, Florida 32679 James A. Sawyer, Esquire Department of HRS 3001 SW Broadway Ocala, Florida 32672 Alvin J. Taylor, Secretary Attn: Susan B. Taylor, Esquire Department of HRS Building One, Room 406 1323 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32301
Findings Of Fact Petitioner Mary Cecelia Williams requested a formal hearing after the required informal conference with a supervisor employed by Respondent Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services. On June 28, 1981 Williams, a black female who lives with two other person , filed a Household Application for low income energy assistance together with a medical certificate (Form 137 May 81) which had the words "which would be life-threatening" crossed out by the physician. She was notified on July 2, 1981 that the application was denied for the reason that the physician did not indicate the need for cooling services was life-threatening. Petitioner did not dispute the fact the medical certification was altered but stated at the hearing that she had no money to see another physician. Both Petitioner and her son have breathing difficulties and she believes her application for cooling benefits should be reconsidered.
Recommendation Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law the Hearing Officer recommends that a final order be entered by the Respondent Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services denying low income energy benefits to Petitioner. DONE and ORDERED this 11th day of December, 1981, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND Hearing Officer Department of Administration Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 11th day of December, 1981. COPIES FURNISHED: Mary Cecelia Williams 1112 NW Seventh Avenue Gainesville, Florida 32601 James Sawyer, Esquire Department of HRS 2002 NW 13th Street Oak Park Executive Square Gainesville, Florida 32601 David H. Pingree, Secretary Attn: Susan B. Kirkland, Esquire Department of HRS Building One, Room 406 1323 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32301
Findings Of Fact Petitioner Roslyn Moody requested a hearing by a letter received in the office of Respondent on May 7, 1981. After the required informal conference with a supervisor in the Respondent Department Petitioner requested a formal hearing. On January 6, 198 Moody, a white female, filed a Household Application for low income energy assistance. She lives alone in an apartment in the Hotel Putman for which she pays $225.00 rent each month. She cleans her own apartment, does her own laundry and pays for the soap and other necessary items. She receives no bill for heating fuel, and her rent has not increased during the past year. The hotel in which she lives is subsidized by HUD, and Petitioner is charged a flat rental fee. She is not charged for excess utilities or a utility surcharge which includes heating costs. By Notice of Application Denial mailed January 6, 1981 Petitioner was informed that she was denied assistance for the reason that she is not responsible for paying her heating bill and therefore is not eligible for the program benefits. The vulnerability of Hotel Putman and Petitioner was provided by the hotel operator upon inquiry by the Respondent. The action was taken by Respondent within 45 days of Petitioner's application, and she was promptly notified of the reason for denial of benefits. Petitioner did not dispute the evidence presented by Respondent Department but as convinced that she should be eligible since she pays rent and the cost of her own upkeep and her income is low.
Recommendation Based on the foregoing findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law the Hearing Officer recommends that low income energy benefits be denied Petitioner. DONE and ORDERED this 8th day of June, 1981, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND Hearing Officer on of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building 200 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 8th day of June, 1981. COPIES FURNISHED: Ms. Roslyn Moody 225 West New York Avenue Hotel Putman - Apt. 419 Deland, Florida 32720 Leo J. Stellwagen, Esquire Department of HRS 5920 Arlington Expressway Post office Box 2417-F Jacksonville, Florida 32231 Alvin J. Taylor, Secretary Attn: Susan B. Kirkland, Esquire Department of HRS Building One, Room 406 1323 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32301
Findings Of Fact Petitioner is a single parent and the head of a household comprising herself and her two children. In her application, Exhibit 1, Petitioner lists her monthly income at $800. The accuracy of this figure was not contested at the hearing. Based upon this income Respondent determined Petitioner was not eligible for Low-Income Home Energy Assistance and denied her application. Petitioner does not contend that she was unfairly discriminated against or that Respondent failed to comply with the regulations determining eligibility for Low-income Energy Assistance payments. Petitioner's sole argument is that because she works to support her family she is denied these payments, while others who are too indolent to work are given these payments from the taxes Petitioner pays.
